[GLUTEN-11379][VL] remove banned class from spark-32 build#11840
Open
zhouyuan wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Open
[GLUTEN-11379][VL] remove banned class from spark-32 build#11840zhouyuan wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
zhouyuan wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yuan <yuanzhou@apache.org>
zhouyuan
commented
Mar 27, 2026
| <ignoreClass>org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter$SpillableIterator</ignoreClass> | ||
| <ignoreClass>org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter$ChainedIterator</ignoreClass> | ||
| <ignoreClass>org.apache.spark.memory.MemoryConsumer</ignoreClass> | ||
| <ignoreClass>org.apache.spark.memory.TaskMemoryManager</ignoreClass> |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
remove the outdated ignoreClass rule for spark-32, as spark-32 support is retired
How was this patch tested?
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Related issue: #11379