api:rename RegisterCmd.java => RegisterUserKeyCmd.java

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR renames

• RegisterCmd.java => RegisterUserKeyCmd.java
• RegisterResponse.java => RegisterUserKeyResponse.java

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.56%. Comparing base (0a13fb2) to head (6d3cc61).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on 4.22.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ack/api/command/admin/user/RegisterUserKeyCmd.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...udstack/api/command/admin/user/GetUserKeysCmd.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...oudstack/api/response/RegisterUserKeyResponse.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...in/java/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...c/main/java/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.22   #12259   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.55%   17.56%           
- Complexity    15544    15548    +4     
=========================================
  Files          5910     5910           
  Lines        529162   529162           
  Branches      64641    64641           
=========================================
+ Hits          92918    92940   +22     
+ Misses       425786   425764   -22     
  Partials      10458    10458           

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.63% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16055

[shwstppr]

code lgtm

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15009)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52377 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12259-t15009-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 148 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	38.17	test_kubernetes_clusters.py

[DaanHoogland]

Do you think this needs testing beyond regression tests, @weizhouapache ?

[weizhouapache]

Do you think this needs testing beyond regression tests, @weizhouapache ?

I think no.. it just renames java classes