server: control honouring internal IDs by old APIs

[shwstppr]

Description

Fixes #9684

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.57%. Comparing base (bfc4f60) to head (77edb37).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ava/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamProcessWorker.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11976   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.56%   17.57%           
- Complexity    15540    15547    +7     
=========================================
  Files          5909     5909           
  Lines        529045   529057   +12     
  Branches      64615    64618    +3     
=========================================
+ Hits          92933    92959   +26     
+ Misses       425657   425641   -16     
- Partials      10455    10457    +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.63% <50.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm (as said on the issue, we can expand on it but good as is)

[shwstppr]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16647

[DaanHoogland]

@nvazquez can you check/review?

[shwstppr]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests