Skip to content

Conversation

@tarun-google
Copy link
Contributor

@tarun-google tarun-google commented Jan 12, 2026

Update Ratelimiter execution function name from throttle -> allow, as throttle seems more apt for throttler. In ratelimiter we either allow request(by fetching tokens with retry) or do not allow(if retries exceeded)

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tarun-google, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and precision of the RateLimiter API by renaming its primary decision-making function. The change from throttle to allow better communicates the intent of the function, which is to grant or deny access based on rate limits, thereby improving the overall readability and conceptual accuracy of the rate limiting mechanism.

Highlights

  • Function Renaming: The core execution function within the RateLimiter component has been renamed from throttle to allow. This change improves semantic clarity, as allow more accurately reflects the rate limiter's behavior of either permitting or denying a request, as opposed to throttle, which implies slowing down.
  • Consistent API Usage: All instances where the throttle method was called, including examples, tests, and the ML inference base, have been updated to use the new allow method, ensuring consistency across the codebase.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@tarun-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

Run Python_ML PreCommit 3.11

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @tvalentyn for label python.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Copy link
Contributor

@jrmccluskey jrmccluskey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@jrmccluskey jrmccluskey merged commit d022338 into apache:master Jan 12, 2026
105 of 106 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants