-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Feat: scatterometry - add new satellites #1265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@lbesnard should we just leave this open until |
|
@leonardolaiolo do we actually need this for SRS scatterometry in the new infra? We won't be creating manifest files, am I right? If we don't need this bit of code, all of the satellites are listed in the prefect pipeline (https://github.com/aodn/dataflow-orchestration/blob/989a9e5597dbe8436fb5f2e566c36afee3434bd9/projects/ingestion/classify/srs/srs_surface_waves.py#L42) |
|
We migrated this pipeline, but we did not enable it - saying that I have a task for this iteration to enable it. So yes, if there are changes here and @lbesnard wants them to prod we should migrate this to our repo as well. |
|
yes, it hasn't been enabled yet but should be in the top list as it was impossible to enable new satellites in the pipeline config (aodndata) for most of the surface waves dataset collections (including the scatterometry). The facility is aware of the fact we were unable to update the legacy pipeline and they were happy to wait for us to fully migrate and enable the surface waves pipeline into the new infra when convenient for us. |
I think so... though I don't know the full story of this dataset or changes being made. As @evacougnon mentioned, we don't need manifest files in the new framework (at least for now I don't think there will be a need for them). The scripts in |
|
@evacougnon |
I'm wondering how the system will cope with 100K+ of files as is the case with this dataset. Is the processing going to take weeks for example? |
Are they coming all together? I think the batch handling will deal with these cases? @craigrose probably we need to keep an eye on this once we turn the switch? |
yeap. they're currently scp'd. Could be way more than 100K files |
No description provided.