Skip to content

[togetherai] Require reasoning options metadata#2151

Merged
rekram1-node merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/togetherai-required-reasoning-options
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

[togetherai] Require reasoning options metadata#2151
rekram1-node merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/togetherai-required-reasoning-options

Conversation

@rekram1-node

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • add reasoning_options = [] to the three Together AI reasoning models that lacked the mandatory field
  • cover Google Gemma 4, Pearl Gemma 4, and deprecated MiniMax M2.5
  • preserve all verified non-empty controls and existing fixed arrays; reasoning-disabled models continue to omit options

An empty array means reasoning capability is known, but the exact provider controls remain unspecified under the mandatory-field policy.

Validation

  • bun validate
  • generated Together invariant scan: 18 reasoning models, 5 empty arrays, 13 non-empty controls, 0 missing options, 0 reasoning-disabled models with options
  • git diff --check
  • diff scope: 3 Together TOMLs, 0 test paths

@rekram1-node rekram1-node merged commit 9379be8 into dev Jun 11, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant