Skip to content

Conversation

@lethargicpanda
Copy link
Collaborator

Update the imagen-generate models as the -preview-06-06 model is going away.

I am also downgrading the imagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001 in the imagen editing sample to imagen-4.0-generate-001 since the sample doesn't benefit from the specs of ultra.

Update the Imagen generate models
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @lethargicpanda, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on maintaining the currency and efficiency of the Imagen model usage within various samples. It addresses the deprecation of a preview model by migrating to a stable version and optimizes one sample by selecting a less resource-intensive model where the advanced capabilities are not needed. Additionally, a minor documentation update improves clarity.

Highlights

  • Imagen Model Update: The imagen-generate models have been updated across several samples, specifically replacing the deprecated imagen-4.0-generate-preview-06-06 with the stable imagen-4.0-generate-001.
  • Model Downgrade for Optimization: The imagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001 model in the imagen-editing sample has been downgraded to imagen-4.0-generate-001 as the sample does not require the 'ultra' capabilities, optimizing resource usage.
  • Documentation Clarification: The magic-selfie sample's README.md has been updated to refer to 'Imagen model' instead of 'Imagen API' for better clarity.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@lethargicpanda lethargicpanda marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 18:48
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Imagen model names used across several samples. The changes are necessary to replace a deprecated preview model and to downgrade another for better resource utilization, as explained in the description. The modifications are correct and well-justified. I have provided a couple of suggestions to improve code maintainability by extracting hardcoded model names into constants, which is a good practice and consistent with other parts of the codebase.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ksemenova ksemenova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@lethargicpanda lethargicpanda merged commit 8e6dacb into main Jan 19, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants