Skip to content

fix(PeriphDrivers): Bug fixing for GPIO drive strength issues#1514

Merged
ttmut merged 1 commit intoanalogdevicesinc:mainfrom
Zyuangeorge:fix/cfsio-15510-gpio-drive-strength
Feb 23, 2026
Merged

fix(PeriphDrivers): Bug fixing for GPIO drive strength issues#1514
ttmut merged 1 commit intoanalogdevicesinc:mainfrom
Zyuangeorge:fix/cfsio-15510-gpio-drive-strength

Conversation

@Zyuangeorge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Zyuangeorge Zyuangeorge commented Feb 16, 2026

Description

For some parts, Drive Strength 1 corresponds to DS[1:0] = 10, and Drive Strength 2 corresponds to DS[1:0] = 01. Therefore, the enum definitions should follow this ordering in the relevant parts of the code. See the details in CFSIO-2974.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added MAX32660 Related to the MAX32660 (ME11) MAX32670 Related to the MAX32670 (ME15) MAX32672 Related to the MAX32672 (ME21) MAX32675 Related to the MAX32675 (ME16) MAX32662 Related to the MAX32662 (ME12) MAX32657 Related to the MAX32655 (ME30) labels Feb 16, 2026
@Zyuangeorge Zyuangeorge marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2026 17:17
* For MAX32657, MAX32660, MAX32662, MAX32670, MAX32672, MAX32675,
  Drive Strength 1 is DS[1:0]=10, Drive Strength 2 is DS[1:0]=01.

Signed-off-by: Zhe-Yuan_adi <zhe.yuan@analog.com>
@Zyuangeorge Zyuangeorge force-pushed the fix/cfsio-15510-gpio-drive-strength branch from 0a8fcde to 5cce807 Compare February 20, 2026 12:41
@ttmut ttmut merged commit f834768 into analogdevicesinc:main Feb 23, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

MAX32657 Related to the MAX32655 (ME30) MAX32660 Related to the MAX32660 (ME11) MAX32662 Related to the MAX32662 (ME12) MAX32670 Related to the MAX32670 (ME15) MAX32672 Related to the MAX32672 (ME21) MAX32675 Related to the MAX32675 (ME16)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants