fix(analytical): Fix WCC's wrong result

[songqing]

What do these changes do?

When run this WCC algorithm with only one worker, the algorithm will only compute one iteration, so as to cause wrong result.
Fix by add ForceContinue() in PEval() when needed.

[songqing]

@zhanglei1949 please help a review

[zhanglei1949]

LGTM

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 30.49%. Comparing base (7ec6d6c) to head (96f1da6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4623      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   33.02%   30.49%   -2.53%     
==========================================
  Files         127      127              
  Lines       13299    13316      +17     
==========================================
- Hits         4392     4061     -331     
- Misses       8907     9255     +348     

see 27 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 613a464...96f1da6. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

/cc @yecol @sighingnow, this issus/pr has had no activity for a long time, please help to review the status and assign people to work on it.

[songqing]

@zhanglei1949 could you help merge this PR?

[zhanglei1949]

@songqing Could you run the failed checks?

[songqing]

@songqing Could you run the failed checks?

@zhanglei1949 hi master, the failed UT before seems have nothing to do with my PR, and I rebase my PR now, please help trigger the check