remove third party archived repos from docs

[Polandia94]

What do these changes do?

• Moved aiocache from third party to first party list
• Removed broken link to pytest-aiohttp-client
• Removed compromised repo gain
• Removed archived repos: raven-aiohttp, aiohttp-login
• Removed deprecated repo (on their readme): aiohttp-transmute

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

Related issue number

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES/ folder

  • name it <issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst (e.g. 588.bugfix.rst)

  • if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
    number after creating the PR

    • .bugfix: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an
      improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
      pre-agreed expectations.
    • .feature: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff.
    • .deprecation: A declaration of future API removals and breaking
      changes in behavior.
    • .breaking: When something public is removed in a breaking way.
      Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
    • .doc: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build
      process.
    • .packaging: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects
      and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
      runtime assumptions.
    • .contrib: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.
      Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
      environment.
    • .misc: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above
      categories.

  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
    for example:

    Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files
    -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`.

    Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
    referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
    of this project.

[codecov]

❌ 1 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
4578	1	4577	142

View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time

tests.test_cookie_helpers::test_cookie_pattern_performance

Stack Traces | 0.16s run time

#x1B[0m#x1B[94mdef#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[92mtest_cookie_pattern_performance#x1B[39;49;00m() -> #x1B[94mNone#x1B[39;49;00m:#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
    #x1B[90m    #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"""Test that the cookie pattern doesn't suffer from ReDoS issues."""#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        COOKIE_PATTERN_TIME_THRESHOLD_SECONDS = #x1B[94m0.08#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        value = #x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33ma#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m + #x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m=#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m * #x1B[94m21651#x1B[39;49;00m + #x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m\x00#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        start = time.perf_counter()#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        match = helpers._COOKIE_PATTERN.match(value)#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        elapsed = time.perf_counter() - start#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
    #x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        #x1B[90m# If this is taking more time, there's probably a performance/ReDoS issue.#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
>       #x1B[94massert#x1B[39;49;00m elapsed < COOKIE_PATTERN_TIME_THRESHOLD_SECONDS, (#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
            #x1B[33mf#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33mPattern took #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m{#x1B[39;49;00melapsed#x1B[90m #x1B[39;49;00m*#x1B[90m #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[94m1000#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m:#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m.1f#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m}#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33mms, #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
            #x1B[33mf#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33mexpected <#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m{#x1B[39;49;00mCOOKIE_PATTERN_TIME_THRESHOLD_SECONDS#x1B[90m #x1B[39;49;00m*#x1B[90m #x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[94m1000#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m:#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m.0f#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m}#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33mms - potential ReDoS issue#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[33m"#x1B[39;49;00m#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
        )#x1B[90m#x1B[39;49;00m
#x1B[1m#x1B[31mE       AssertionError: Pattern took 122.1ms, expected <80ms - potential ReDoS issue#x1B[0m
#x1B[1m#x1B[31mE       assert 0.1220597709999538 < 0.08#x1B[0m

COOKIE_PATTERN_TIME_THRESHOLD_SECONDS = 0.08
elapsed    = 0.1220597709999538
match      = None
start      = 531.191323104
value      = 'a====================================================================================================================...==================================================================================================================\x00'

#x1B[1m#x1B[31mtests/test_cookie_helpers.py#x1B[0m:649: AssertionError

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 72 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 72 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing Polandia94:remove-old-third-party-from-docs (af1abc2) with master (8903033)}

Footnotes

1. 72 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩