Skip to content

Conversation

@jchatfranklin
Copy link
Contributor

This is a test to determine whether my commit will pass the DCO check.

In paragraph 1, sentence 2, I simply changed "with" to "possessing." While IMHO this is a slightly better way to say it, the meaning is unchanged and you can feel free either save and commit this revision or decline it and stet (which is editor-speak for "let it stand," or ignore this suggested change).

If the DCO check passes, I'll look in the repository for review urgent doc requests and advise when I select one.

This is a test to determine whether my commit will pass the DCO check.

In paragraph 1, sentence 2, I simply changed "with" to "possessing."  While IMHO this is a lightly better way to say it, the meaning is unchanged and you can save and commit this revision or decline it and stet (which is editor-speak for "let it stand," or ignore this suggested change).
@jchatfranklin jchatfranklin requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2026 22:38
@jchatfranklin jchatfranklin requested review from keraron and removed request for a team January 12, 2026 22:38
@keraron
Copy link
Member

keraron commented Jan 13, 2026

Hi looks like the signoff is still missing :/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants