Skip to content

fix: exercise negative egress probe#75

Merged
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/p04-negative-egress-and-manifest
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

fix: exercise negative egress probe#75
aryeko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/p04-negative-egress-and-manifest

Conversation

@aryeko

@aryeko aryeko commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes F8 by replacing the hardcoded negative-egress failure with an exercised negative-egress attempt and recorded blocked / open / ambiguous observation.
  • Fixes F9 by failing createRealExecutionHost closed when a probe declares substrate requests without an approved substrate manifest.
  • Threads the negative-egress observation into real-host attestation and documents that this is mechanism proof, not EVRUN-full real-effect evidence.

Verification

  • corepack pnpm vitest run packages/jig-sdk/tests/providers.real-confinement.p4.unit.test.ts packages/jig-sdk/tests/providers.real-host.p6.unit.test.ts packages/jig-sdk/tests/smoke/real-host.p4.smoke.test.ts (smoke skipped without EVRUN_SMOKE)
  • corepack pnpm vitest run packages/jig-sdk/tests/records-golden.int.test.ts
  • corepack pnpm check

Review

  • Independent Codex reviewer approved the F8/F9 scope.

Limitations

  • Real negative-egress smoke was not executed in this hermetic phase; real-effect proof remains in the later EVRUN-full lane.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 50776abbd2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/jig-sdk/src/providers/real/confinement.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/jig-sdk/src/providers/real/confinement.ts Outdated
@aryeko aryeko force-pushed the fix/p04-negative-egress-and-manifest branch from 50776ab to f111c6b Compare July 6, 2026 13:04
@aryeko aryeko merged commit 1e23b5f into main Jul 6, 2026
1 check passed
@aryeko aryeko deleted the fix/p04-negative-egress-and-manifest branch July 6, 2026 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant