Add MIT rule variant with attribution and no-endorsement clause#4721
Add MIT rule variant with attribution and no-endorsement clause#4721dikshaa2909 wants to merge 6 commits intoaboutcode-org:developfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
3794879 to
5ac7c1d
Compare
|
The CI failures are due to workflows awaiting maintainer approval Happy to update if any adjustments are needed. |
|
This is not how required phrases are added, please check other rules for examples. We use curly brackets You are also not using the PR template which asks you to fix the tests etc, check contributing to see what you need to follow |
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
85b66fe to
efcf8a8
Compare
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
441f6b5 to
3152d25
Compare
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: dikshaa2909 <dikshadeware@gmail.com>
|
Thanks for the clarification , I’ve updated the rule to follow existing patterns by using {{ }} markers directly in the license text and removed the incorrect required_phrases usage. |
Fixes #4719
Summary
This PR adds a new MIT license rule variant that includes an explicit
attribution requirement and a no-endorsement clause, as used by
Sinusoidal Systems AB.
The rule follows existing ScanCode license rule conventions and does not
introduce any code or logic changes.
Details
{{ }}) are used only inside the license text body,consistent with existing MIT rules in the repository
required_phrasesmetadata is used, in line with similar MIT rulesTesting
Signed-off-by: Diksha Deware dikshadeware@gmail.com