refactor: extract handlePaymentReceived helper in subscribeInvoice#3822
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the payment handling logic within the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively refactors the subscribeInvoice method by extracting a handlePaymentReceived helper, which centralizes post-payment actions and improves code clarity. This change also correctly addresses a bug where lndhub payments didn't trigger a balance refresh. Additionally, channel data is now correctly refreshed only after Lightning payments, and this logic has been consistently applied to SendingLightning.tsx as well. My only suggestion is to remove some debugging console.log statements from the new helper function.
Note: Security Review did not run due to the size of the PR.
0e8f57e to
5bff34f
Compare
Description
Based on #3793.
Extracts a
handlePaymentReceivedhelper that centralizes the post-payment actions shared across all 5 backend implementations insubscribeInvoice(setWatchedInvoicePaid,getCombinedBalance,getChannels, POS recording).Bug fix:
lndhubwas not callinggetCombinedBalanceafter receiving a payment, so the displayed balance never refreshed.getChannelswas being called after on-chain payments, but channels are unaffected by received on-chain payments, so it now only refreshes after LN payments.Question:
I noticed
embedded-lnduses>whilelightning-node-connectandlnduse>=to check on-chain confirmations:embedded-lnd:
transaction.num_confirmations > numConfPreferencelightning-node-connect:
result.num_confirmations >= numConfPreferencelnd:
result.num_confirmations >= numConfPreferenceWith
numConfPreferencebeing0(0 conf) or1(1 conf), the>inembedded-lndwould mean 0 conf mode still requires at least 1 confirmation, and 1 conf mode requires 2. Is this intentional, or should it be>=to match the other implementations?This pull request is categorized as a:
Checklist
yarn run tscand made sure my code compiles correctlyyarn run lintand made sure my code didn’t contain any problematic patternsyarn run prettierand made sure my code is formatted correctlyyarn run testand made sure all of the tests passTesting
If you modified or added a utility file, did you add new unit tests?
I have tested this PR on the following platforms (please specify OS version and phone model/VM):
I have tested this PR with the following types of nodes (please specify node version and API version where appropriate):
Locales
Third Party Dependencies and Packages
yarnafter this PR is merged inpackage.jsonandyarn.lockhave been properly updatedOther: