fix: add missing bugs metadata field to package.json

[BWM0223]

Adds missing package metadata fields to package.json.

This allows npm tooling and consumers to correctly resolve package metadata.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated package configuration to point to the project's issue tracker for bug reporting.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b8db8b2b-0769-46cd-9aba-be31e369a28c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between feb1efd and 2623379.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a bugs field to package.json, pointing to the GitHub issues URL for TanStack Query. The field is added at the top level alongside other package metadata, enabling automated tools and package registry platforms to discover the issue tracker.

Changes

Package Metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Bugs field addition package.json	A new top-level bugs object is introduced with the URL pointing to the GitHub issues tracker.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A tiny field, but oh so neat,
Points to the bugs where devs all meet,
Issues tracked with care and pride,
GitHub issues open wide! 🐛✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is missing required sections from the template (Changes details, Checklist items, and Release Impact declaration).	Fill in the template sections: add details under 🎯 Changes, complete the ✅ Checklist, and specify the 🚀 Release Impact (whether a changeset is needed).

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately and clearly summarizes the main change: adding a missing bugs metadata field to package.json.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}