Skip to content

fix(proxy): fail over unary refresh connect errors#824

Open
Komzpa wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
fix/unary-refresh-connect-failover
Open

fix(proxy): fail over unary refresh connect errors#824
Komzpa wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
fix/unary-refresh-connect-failover

Conversation

@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Komzpa Komzpa commented May 26, 2026

Summary

  • add a shared pre-visible unary freshness helper that retries another eligible account on transient refresh/connect failures
  • apply it to thread-goal, codex-control, transcribe, and file create/finalize flows
  • keep strict file-owner operations fail-closed instead of moving pinned file operations across accounts

Tests

  • uv run pytest tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py::test_thread_goal_refresh_connection_reset_fails_over tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py::test_codex_control_refresh_connection_reset_fails_over tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py::test_transcribe_refresh_connection_reset_fails_over tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py::test_files_create_refresh_connection_reset_fails_over tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py::test_files_finalize_pinned_refresh_connection_reset_fails_closed -q
  • uv run pytest tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py -q
  • uv run ruff check app/modules/proxy/service.py tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py
  • uv run ruff format --check app/modules/proxy/service.py tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py
  • uv run ty check app/modules/proxy/service.py tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py
  • python -m compileall -q app/modules/proxy/service.py tests/unit/test_proxy_utils.py
  • git diff --check

No linked issue; addresses the owner-review unary refresh/connect failover gate in this PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1657afef1a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py Outdated
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 26, 2026
@Komzpa Komzpa force-pushed the fix/unary-refresh-connect-failover branch from 1657afe to 9c926b9 Compare May 26, 2026 17:50
@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 26, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 26, 2026

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 26, 2026

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@Soju06
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Soju06 commented May 27, 2026

Merge-gate hold from owner review: the targeted unary refresh/connect failover code and focused tests look OK, but current repo gates are not satisfied.

  • Current-head Codex review is missing: the latest @codex review attempts hit Codex usage limits, and the PR has no 🤖 codex: ok label.
  • This changes observable proxy failover behavior but has no active OpenSpec change delta.
  • The PR body has no Fixes #... / Closes #... issue trace.

I did not find a code-level blocker in the targeted refresh/connect failover path, but I would hold merge until the above gates are addressed or explicitly waived.

@Soju06 Soju06 added the hermes: needs-followup Hermes left a blocker/comment that needs follow-up observation label May 27, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@Soju06
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Soju06 commented May 27, 2026

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 31, 2026

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8a026345d8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py Outdated
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
@Soju06
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Soju06 commented May 31, 2026

@codex review

1 similar comment
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 31, 2026

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d0bdd45b61

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py Outdated
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 31, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6a2ea9133a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py Outdated
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label May 31, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f0312a192e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 089189125f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/core/clients/proxy.py
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: df3b6da2f1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a0957f99b7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9b3d3b96ff

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/modules/proxy/service.py
@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented Jun 1, 2026

@codex review

@Soju06 Soju06 removed the 🤖 codex: needs work [@codex review] raised an issue label Jun 1, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Komzpa Komzpa added 🤖 codex: ok [@codex review] says no issues found. and removed hermes: needs-followup Hermes left a blocker/comment that needs follow-up observation labels Jun 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖 codex: ok [@codex review] says no issues found.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants