Skip to content

ci: label pull requests with database migrations#784

Closed
Komzpa wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/pr-766-db-migration-labeler
Closed

ci: label pull requests with database migrations#784
Komzpa wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/pr-766-db-migration-labeler

Conversation

@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Komzpa Komzpa commented May 23, 2026

Supersedes #766 with the same workflow-labeler diff on an in-repository branch. The original fork PR is stuck in GitHub mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED despite all required checks passing and a clean Codex review, likely because it modifies workflow files from a fork.\n\nThis keeps the code review surface identical:\n- add db migration labeler rule for Alembic migrations\n- add PR labeler workflow pinned to a full action SHA\n\nValidation already run on #766 before replacement:\n- all required CI checks passed on f1357bf\n- Codex review clean\n\nCloses #766.

@Soju06
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Soju06 commented May 23, 2026

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Soju06 Soju06 added the 🤖 codex: ok [@codex review] says no issues found. label May 23, 2026
@Komzpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Komzpa commented May 23, 2026

Closing as duplicate of older PR #766. This replacement PR was unnecessary; review/merge should continue on #766.

@Komzpa Komzpa closed this May 23, 2026
@Komzpa Komzpa deleted the fix/pr-766-db-migration-labeler branch May 23, 2026 04:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖 codex: ok [@codex review] says no issues found.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants