Skip to content

Social-AI-Studio/SafeLens

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

44 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

SafeLens: Hateful Video Moderation

Demo Video

Repo Guide

Repo Layout

  • web/ — Website/UI for the demo and docs. Everything related to the web frontend shown in the video demo lives here.
  • auth-service/ — Authentication service (API and logic). Everything related to auth lives here. (required to setup the web demo)

Project Tree

.
├── web/               # Website/UI (backend & frontend)
│   ├── frontend/      # frontend
│   └── ...            # backend
├── auth-service/      # Authentication service
│   ├── src/
│   └── ...
├── README.md

Setup

  1. Setup auth-service/ by following auth-service/README.md
  2. Setup web/ by following web/README.md and web/frontend/README.md

Evaluation

We benchmarked multiple policy LLMs and vision–language (VL) back ends on 19 videos (~10% of the training data) using two complementary perspectives:

  • Duration-weighted (time micro-average): emphasizes longer harmful spans.
  • Segment-level (count micro-average): treats each segment equally.

Ground truth: 1,593 s harmful of 4,400 s total (~36.2%); 183 harmful segments of 530 (~34.5%).


Table 1. Duration-weighted results (time micro-average)

Model (VL + Policy LLM) TP TN FP FN Harmful Duration (s) Total Duration (s) F1 Score Precision Recall
Qwen2.5-VL + DeepSeek-R1 652 2331 476 941 1593 4400 47.90% 57.80% 40.90%
Qwen2.5-VL + Llama-3.3-8B-Instruct 651 2300 507 942 1593 4400 47.34% 56.20% 40.90%
Qwen2.5-VL + GPT-5 670 2194 613 923 1593 4400 46.59% 52.22% 42.06%
BLIP-2 + class classifier + GPT-5 583 2458 349 1010 1593 4400 46.19% 62.60% 36.60%
BLIP-2 + GPT-5 573 2442 365 1020 1593 4400 45.31% 61.10% 36.00%
Qwen2.5-VL + Gemini-2.5-Flash 552 2413 394 1041 1593 4400 43.53% 58.40% 34.70%
Qwen2.5-VL + Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct 378 2663 144 1215 1593 4400 35.71% 72.40% 23.70%
Qwen2.5-VL + Our finetuned Llama-3-8B 760 271 2157 650 1593 4400 50.62% 53.90% 47.71%

Table 2. Segment-level results (count micro-average)

Model (VL + Policy LLM) TP TN FP FN Total Harmful Segments Total Segments F1 Score Precision Recall
Qwen2.5-VL + DeepSeek-R1 72 289 58 111 183 530 46.00% 55.38% 39.34%
Qwen2.5-VL + Llama-3.3-8B-Instruct 72 282 65 111 183 530 45.00% 52.55% 39.34%
Qwen2.5-VL + GPT-5 77 278 69 106 183 530 46.81% 52.74% 42.08%
BLIP-2 + class classifier + GPT-5 64 306 41 119 183 530 44.44% 60.95% 34.97%
BLIP-2 + GPT-5 63 302 45 120 183 530 43.30% 58.33% 34.43%
Qwen2.5-VL + Gemini-2.5-Flash 59 303 44 124 183 530 41.26% 57.29% 32.24%
Qwen2.5-VL + Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct 39 329 18 144 183 530 32.50% 68.42% 21.31%
Qwen2.5-VL + Our finetuned Llama-3-8B 83 271 76 100 183 530 48.54% 52.20% 45.35%

Key Takeaways

  • Our finetuned Llama-3-8B achieves the best F1 score at both duration and segment levels.
  • It also delivers the highest recall (+5–6% absolute improvement), capturing more harmful content.
  • Precision remains competitive, slightly lower than the highest-precision baseline (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct).
  • Overall, our model provides the best balance between precision and recall for harmful video detection.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors