Use mri-stack from TestImages. Fixes #40#41
Use mri-stack from TestImages. Fixes #40#41timholy wants to merge 1 commit intoSimonDanisch:masterfrom timholy:pull-request/7519a7a8
Conversation
|
This can be closed, right? |
| vol = testimage("mri-stack") | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| window = GLPlot.init() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is currently no such method. Shouldn't it be
window = createdisplay()?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're probably on an old version. Try Pkg.checkout("GLPlot")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, that helped. although i still does not display the projections, just the 3d view
|
Or merged? |
|
I don't think there's anything important here anymore...the main problem this was designed to solve was the fact that the original example referred to a file on your harddrive, and I was trying to use a publicly-available dataset. You replaced this file with one where you synthesize a 3d dataset, and in some ways that's nicer because you have complete control over resolution, etc. So perhaps the only reason to use this is if you want users looking at a "real image" rather than a synthetic one. One other point worth making is that "mri-stack" has very poor resolution along the z axis, and it's 5x different from the resolution in x and y. That might be useful in terms of making sure that your display algorithms handle anisotropic images correctly; on the other hand, it looks really crappy if the user rotates the sample so that the z-axis is nearly in-plane. |
|
Let me know what you want to do; if you decide you want this (perhaps as a second volume example), I'd be very happy to contribute it. |
3 participants
Requires JuliaImages/TestImages.jl#29 and JuliaGL/GLVisualize.jl#143. The new file is quite small, so the resolution isn't impressive, but on the other hand the anisotropic pixel spacing represents a good test of functionality that's crucial for almost anyone doing volumetric visualization.