chore: add code linting and formatting#77
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To continue reviewing without waiting, purchase usage credits in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
WalkthroughThis PR establishes PowerShell code quality infrastructure by introducing linting and formatting rule configurations, a test suite to validate compliance, VS Code integration, and an automated GitHub Actions CI workflow that runs tests on every push and pull request. ChangesPowerShell Code Quality Infrastructure
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/ci.yml:
- Line 1: Normalize the .github/workflows/ci.yml file to use LF line endings
instead of CRLF: open the file and convert all line endings to LF, commit the
change, and optionally add/update a .gitattributes entry (e.g., for *.yml text
eol=lf) to prevent future CRLF commits; ensure CI/lint passes locally after
conversion before pushing.
In `@tests/Linter.Tests.ps1`:
- Around line 23-27: Initialize $type before the extension switch (or add a
default branch) to avoid carrying a stale value when $r.ScriptName doesn't match
'*.psm1','*.ps1', or '*.psd1'; update the switch block that uses "switch
-wildCard ($r.ScriptName)" (and the similar block around lines 53-57) so that
$type is either set to a safe default prior to the switch or add a default
pattern (e.g., Default) that assigns an explicit value, ensuring tests/logs
never reuse a previous record's $type.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 68c4a255-171b-496f-b9c9-052f7b25b1a3
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/ci.yml.psformatrules.psd1.pslintrules.psd1.vscode/settings.jsontests/Linter.Tests.ps1tests/run.ps1
b90c316 to
3836a66
Compare
|
CI is expected to fail as I haven't touched |
3836a66 to
92918f6
Compare
Signed-off-by: Chawye Hsu <su+git@chawyehsu.com>
92918f6 to
4a34bfd
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores