Fix Format Check: format FastPowerEnzymeExt.jl (SciMLStyle)#56
Fix Format Check: format FastPowerEnzymeExt.jl (SciMLStyle)#56ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The Format Check CI (SciML/.github format-check.yml@v1, JuliaFormatter v2
SciMLStyle) was red on main because ext/FastPowerEnzymeExt.jl was not
formatted. Applying `format(".", SciMLStyle())` only touches this one file;
re-running afterward reports the tree as already formatted. Purely cosmetic;
no semantic change.
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Status update: this PR is now obsolete and should not be merged. It reformats Verified locally with Runic v1.7.0: Recommend closing without merge; the format check it targeted no longer exists and the tree is already Runic-clean. |
What
The
Format Check / Check Formattingjob onmainwas failing. That job runs the SciML shared workflowSciML/.github/.github/workflows/format-check.yml@v1, which applies JuliaFormatter v2 withSciMLStyle()and fails if any file changes.Locally reproduced on Julia 1.12 (the "1" channel) with JuliaFormatter v2.8.0:
The only unformatted file was
ext/FastPowerEnzymeExt.jl(the@easy_rulemacro call argument layout). This PR applies the canonical formatting. Re-running the formatter afterward reports the tree as already formatted (true), so the Format Check will pass. The change is purely cosmetic with no semantic effect.Note: the other red checks on
mainare downstream tests (OrdinaryDiffEq.jl, SimpleDiffEq.jl) which are out of scope for this repo's own CI.Local verification
julia +1.12with JuliaFormatter v2.8.0 + SciMLStyle: before = needs change (only this file), after = already formatted.Please ignore until reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas