Skip to content

Security: SWORDIntel/IMAGEHARDER

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Overview

IMAGEHARDER is a security-focused media file hardening project designed to process images, audio, and video files with memory safety guarantees and defense-in-depth security measures. This document outlines our security practices, vulnerability disclosure process, and security commitments.

Supported Versions

We provide security updates for the following versions:

Version Supported
0.1.x
< 0.1

Security Architecture

Defense Layers

  1. Memory Safety: Pure Rust implementations eliminate entire classes of vulnerabilities (buffer overflows, use-after-free, double-free)
  2. Kernel Isolation:
    • PID namespaces
    • Network namespaces
    • Mount namespaces
  3. Syscall Filtering: Seccomp-BPF whitelists only required syscalls
  4. Filesystem Restrictions: Landlock LSM limits file access to input files only
  5. WebAssembly Sandboxing: FFmpeg runs in WASM sandbox with no host access
  6. Hardware Acceleration Disabled: Prevents GPU-based exploits
  7. Container Pre-validation: All video containers validated before codec processing

Threat Model

What We Protect Against:

  • Malicious media files exploiting codec vulnerabilities
  • VM escapes via crafted video files
  • CPU desynchronization attacks
  • Malware embedded in media metadata (PowerShell in MP3, etc.)
  • Buffer overflows in image/audio/video parsers
  • Arbitrary code execution via media processing
  • Denial of service via resource exhaustion

What We Do NOT Protect Against:

  • Social engineering attacks
  • Compromised build toolchains (supply chain - see SBOM below)
  • Physical access to hardware
  • Side-channel attacks (timing, speculative execution)
  • Attacks on the host kernel itself

Reporting a Vulnerability

How to Report

DO NOT open a public GitHub issue for security vulnerabilities.

Instead, please report security issues privately via one of the following methods:

  1. Email: security@[YOUR-DOMAIN] (PGP key below)
  2. GitHub Security Advisory: Create a private security advisory

PGP Public Key

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
[Your PGP public key here]
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

What to Include

Please provide the following information in your report:

  • Description: Clear description of the vulnerability
  • Impact: What could an attacker achieve?
  • Attack Vector: How would this be exploited?
  • Proof of Concept: Steps to reproduce (or PoC code/file)
  • Affected Versions: Which versions are vulnerable?
  • Suggested Fix: If you have ideas for remediation

Response Timeline

We are committed to the following response times:

Stage Timeline
Initial Response Within 48 hours
Vulnerability Assessment Within 7 days
Fix Development Within 30 days (critical), 90 days (high)
Public Disclosure 90 days after fix, or coordinated disclosure

Vulnerability Severity Classification

We use the following severity levels based on CVSS v3.1:

Severity CVSS Score Description Example
Critical 9.0-10.0 Remote code execution, VM escape Crafted video causes arbitrary code execution
High 7.0-8.9 Privilege escalation, information disclosure Memory corruption leading to data leak
Medium 4.0-6.9 Denial of service, authentication bypass Malformed file crashes service
Low 0.1-3.9 Minor information leak, edge cases Verbose error messages leak paths

Security Best Practices

For Deployers

  1. Container Isolation: Always run in containers with read-only root filesystem
  2. Resource Limits: Set CPU/memory limits (see kubernetes-deployment.yaml)
  3. Network Policies: Restrict network access (only DNS)
  4. Seccomp Profile: Apply the provided seccomp-profile.json
  5. Regular Updates: Apply security patches within 7 days
  6. Monitoring: Enable Prometheus metrics and configure alerts
  7. File Quarantine: Isolate suspicious files for forensic analysis

For Developers

  1. Dependency Auditing: Run cargo audit before every release
  2. Fuzzing: Run all fuzz targets for 24+ hours before releases
  3. Static Analysis: Use cargo clippy with -D warnings
  4. Memory Safety: Prefer pure Rust; avoid unsafe code
  5. Input Validation: Validate all inputs at boundary (container, then codec)
  6. Fail Closed: Always fail securely (reject on error)

Security Audit History

Date Auditor Scope Findings Report
2024-XX-XX [Auditor] Full codebase review TBD [Link]

Known Vulnerabilities (CVE)

We track all known vulnerabilities in our dependencies:

CVE ID Component Severity Status Fixed In
None - - - -

To check for vulnerabilities in dependencies:

cargo install cargo-audit
cargo audit

Security Updates

Security updates are released as:

  • Patch releases for critical/high severity issues
  • Minor releases for medium severity issues
  • Regular releases for low severity issues

Subscribe to security announcements:

Supply Chain Security

Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)

We provide an SBOM (CycloneDX format) with each release:

cargo install cargo-cyclonedx
cargo cyclonedx --format json > sbom.json

Dependency Policy

  • Only audited crates: All dependencies reviewed for security
  • Minimal dependencies: Keep dependency tree small
  • No C bindings preferred: Pure Rust implementations prioritized
  • Pinned versions: Cargo.lock committed to repository
  • Regular updates: Dependencies updated quarterly (sooner for CVEs)

Reproducible Builds

Our builds are reproducible. Verify with:

cargo build --release
sha256sum target/release/image_harden_cli
# Compare against published checksums

Incident Response

In the event of a security incident:

  1. Detection: Automated alerts via Prometheus/Grafana
  2. Containment: Isolate affected systems, quarantine files
  3. Investigation: Analyze logs, metrics, quarantined files
  4. Remediation: Apply patches, update configurations
  5. Recovery: Restore services, verify integrity
  6. Lessons Learned: Post-mortem, update defenses

See PRODUCTION_DEPLOYMENT.md for detailed runbooks.

Compliance

This project follows security best practices from:

  • OWASP Top 10 (2021)
  • CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
  • CIS Benchmarks (Docker, Kubernetes)

Secure Development Lifecycle

  1. Design: Threat modeling, security requirements
  2. Development: Secure coding practices, code review
  3. Testing: Unit tests, fuzz tests, integration tests
  4. Deployment: Hardened containers, security monitoring
  5. Maintenance: Vulnerability scanning, security updates

Security Testing

Continuous Fuzzing

We run continuous fuzzing via GitHub Actions:

  • 12 fuzz targets (images, audio, video)
  • 35 minutes of fuzzing per CI run
  • Corpus stored in test-corpus/

Run locally:

cargo install cargo-fuzz
cargo fuzz run fuzz_png -- -max_total_time=3600

Penetration Testing

We welcome responsible security research. If you'd like to perform security testing:

In Scope:

  • Parsing of malformed/malicious media files
  • Sandbox escapes (namespaces, seccomp, landlock)
  • Resource exhaustion attacks
  • Memory corruption attempts

Out of Scope:

  • Social engineering
  • Denial of service (DDoS)
  • Physical attacks
  • Third-party services

Security Contacts

  • Security Team: security@[YOUR-DOMAIN]
  • Project Lead: [Your Name] - [email]
  • Security Advisor: [Advisor Name] - [email] (if applicable)

Hall of Fame

We recognize security researchers who have responsibly disclosed vulnerabilities:

Researcher Date Vulnerability Severity
- - - -

Acknowledgments

This security policy is inspired by:

Last Updated: 2024-11-07

This security policy is a living document and will be updated as the project evolves.

There aren’t any published security advisories