Skip to content

Fix links #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
fluffy wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix links #2

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion IETF111-SCIMBOF.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
* No need to "join" IETF, but participants must abide by the IETF [Note well](https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/)

## Overview
For the last several months, company and individual representatives interested in moving the SCIM 2.0 Specification Family (RFC series ([7642](https://https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7642), [7643](https://https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7643), [7644](https://https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7644))) forward have been meeting to discuss implementation experiences, review draft proposals that have expired, and to talk about the paper cuts many in the identity world feel could be improved by revisiting SCIM as a protocol and schema. You can find the notes of these meetings as well as calendar times and recordings at the [SCIM IG Github page](https://github.com/SCIM-Interest-Group/wiki).
For the last several months, company and individual representatives interested in moving the SCIM 2.0 Specification Family (RFC series ([7642](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7642), [7643](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7643), [7644](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7644))) forward have been meeting to discuss implementation experiences, review draft proposals that have expired, and to talk about the paper cuts many in the identity world feel could be improved by revisiting SCIM as a protocol and schema. You can find the notes of these meetings as well as calendar times and recordings at the [SCIM IG Github page](https://github.com/SCIM-Interest-Group/wiki).

## BoF Schedule
Chairs: Barry Leiba, Nancy Cam Winget
Expand Down