Skip to content

Conversation

@alxww55
Copy link

@alxww55 alxww55 commented Dec 22, 2025

Challenge 1 Solution

Submitted by: @alxww55
Challenge: Challenge 1

Description

This PR contains my solution for Challenge 1.

Changes

  • Added solution file to challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go

Testing

  • Solution passes all test cases
  • Code follows Go best practices

Thank you for reviewing my submission! 🚀

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a new Go submission file that implements Sum(a int, b int) int returning a + b, plus a main which reads two integers from stdin using fmt.Scanf("%d, %d"), handles scan errors, calls Sum, and prints the result.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Challenge 1 submission
challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go
New Go file added. Declares package main, adds Sum(a int, b int) int returning a + b, and a main that reads two comma-separated ints with fmt.Scanf("%d, %d"), checks for scan errors, calls Sum, and prints the sum.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding a solution for Challenge 1 by a specific contributor.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is well-structured and directly related to the changeset, providing context about the Challenge 1 submission.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@alxww55
Copy link
Author

alxww55 commented Dec 23, 2025

@coderabbitai help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

CodeRabbit commands

These commands are invoked using PR/Issue comments.

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai evaluate custom pre-merge check --instructions <custom-checks-instructions> --name <custom-checks-title> [--mode <error|warning>] to validate the custom pre-merge checks instructions. Defaults to error when --mode is omitted.
    • @coderabbitai ignore pre-merge checks to override pre-merge checks and get an approval on PR.
    • @coderabbitai run pre-merge checks to run pre-merge checks on the pull request.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • You can also validate your configuration using the online YAML validator.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, support, documentation and community

  • Visit our status page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
  • Visit our documentation site for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord community to connect with other users and get help from the community.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alxww55
Copy link
Author

alxww55 commented Dec 23, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 669bf54 and c607035.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go (1)

1-5: LGTM!

Package declaration and imports are appropriate for this solution.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go (1)

21-24: Sum function is correct; consider idiomatic parameter syntax.

The implementation correctly returns the sum of two integers. The logic is sound and meets the challenge requirements.

As an optional style improvement, Go allows combining consecutive parameters of the same type:

🔎 Optional idiomatic syntax
-func Sum(a int, b int) int {
+func Sum(a, b int) int {
 	return a + b
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c607035 and 0b014e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
challenge-1/submissions/alxww55/solution-template.go (1)

7-19: LGTM - Main function correctly implements the challenge requirements.

The input reading with error handling, Sum invocation, and output printing are all correctly implemented and functional.

@alxww55
Copy link
Author

alxww55 commented Dec 23, 2025

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@alxww55: I'll trigger a full review of the PR from scratch. This will review all the files again, even those that were previously reviewed.

Note: The correct command format is @coderabbitai full review (with a space), but I understand your intent.

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@alxww55
Copy link
Author

alxww55 commented Dec 23, 2025

@coderabbitai run pre-merge checks

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Running Pre-merge checks. Results will be posted in the summary comment once complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant