Skip to content

Use rpm for guest agent version query#5092

Open
geetikakay wants to merge 1 commit into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
geetikakay:fix_ssh_exec
Open

Use rpm for guest agent version query#5092
geetikakay wants to merge 1 commit into
RedHatQE:mainfrom
geetikakay:fix_ssh_exec

Conversation

@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@geetikakay geetikakay commented Jun 1, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it:

rrmngmnt uses which to detect package managers and fails when which itself is missing. which is not installed on the CentOS Stream 10 image. Identified while doing some tests with centos-stream10.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

this is seen during testing centos-stream10
FAILED tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_boot_sources_vm.py::test_instance_type_vm_from_auto_update_boot_source[#centos-stream10-arm64#] - RuntimeError: Can not determine package manager for Host(centos-stream10-arm64-data-source-vm-1779873870-1084452)
FAILED tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_boot_sources_vm.py::test_instance_type_vm_from_auto_update_boot_source[#fedora-arm64#] - RuntimeError: Can not determine package manager for Host(fedora-arm64-data-source-vm-1779873945-74379)

Special notes for reviewer:

None

jira-ticket:

None

Signed-off-by: Geetika Kapoor <gkapoor@redhat.com>
@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.65%. Comparing base (a2dc143) to head (5c5ef7b).
⚠️ Report is 87 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5092      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.67%   98.65%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        2487     2459      -28     
==========================================
- Hits         2454     2426      -28     
  Misses         33       33              
Flag Coverage Δ
utilities 98.65% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-4
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the OWNERS file in the repository root
  • Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are automatically applied based on changes
  • Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified
  • Labels: Enabled categories: branch, can-be-merged, cherry-pick, has-conflicts, hold, needs-rebase, size, verified, wip

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)
  • /regenerate-welcome - Regenerate this welcome message

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest build-container - Rebuild and test container image
  • /retest verify-bugs-are-open - verify-bugs-are-open
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 2 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No wip, hold, has-conflicts labels and PR must be mergeable (no conflicts)
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • dshchedr
  • myakove
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk

Reviewers:

  • RoniKishner
  • dshchedr
  • geetikakay
  • rnetser
  • vsibirsk
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
AI Features
  • Cherry-Pick Conflict Resolution: Enabled (claude/claude-opus-4-6[1m])

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is removed on new commits unless the push is detected as a clean rebase
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated get_linux_guest_agent_version to retrieve qemu-guest-agent version by executing rpm -q qemu-guest-agent over SSH and parsing the output, replacing the prior package manager abstraction approach.

Changes

Guest agent version lookup

Layer / File(s) Summary
RPM-based version lookup
utilities/infra.py
get_linux_guest_agent_version replaces ssh_exec.package_manager.info("qemu-guest-agent") with direct rpm -q qemu-guest-agent command execution and result parsing via guest_agent_version_parser.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related issues

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and directly summarizes the main change: switching to rpm for querying the guest agent version instead of the previous package manager approach.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description covers all required template sections with adequate detail about what changed and why it matters.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest all

Auto-triggered: Files in this PR were modified by merged PR #4954.

Overlapping files

utilities/infra.py

@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai

Test execution plan request details

CRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file.
The inline comment should contain the full Test Execution Plan (smoke decision, gating decision, and specific affected tests).
Do NOT submit a formal review - just post the inline comment directly.

As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan.
You will post an inline review comment with the test execution plan on the first changed file.
If you fail to run or post a comment, retry.

Analysis Requirements:

  1. Examine code changes in each modified file

  2. Identify affected code paths, functions, and classes

  3. Analyze pytest-specific elements: fixtures (scope, dependencies), parametrization, markers, conftest changes

  4. Trace test dependencies through imports, shared utilities, fixture inheritance, fixture teardown, and yield from cleanup in conftest

  5. Detect new tests introduced in the PR

  6. Utilities and libs impact (when utilities/ or libs/ changes):
    You MUST use shell scripts (rg, git diff) to trace the full impact.
    Follow these sub-steps in order:

    6a. Identify modified symbols: For each changed file under utilities/ or libs/,
    list every modified function or method.
    Example: git diff HEAD~1 --unified=0 -- utilities/hco.py | grep '^[+-]def '

    6b. Find direct callers: Search tests and conftest for each symbol from 6a.
    Example: rg -l 'get_hco_version' tests/

    6c. Trace fixture teardown and cleanup: Find fixtures that reach
    the modified symbol through yield from or context-manager wrappers.
    Example: rg -l 'yield from.*enable_common_boot|def.*enable_common_boot' tests/

    6d. Trace same-file callers: In each changed file, find other functions
    whose body calls a modified symbol (including code after yield
    in @contextmanager helpers).
    Example: rg 'get_hco_version|enable_common_boot' utilities/hco.py

    6e. Expand transitively: If function A calls modified B, then
    tests/fixtures that call A are affected — even when the test body
    never imports B directly.

    Do NOT limit impact to tests that import the modified symbol only.

  7. Smoke test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with smoke-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.smoke' tests/
    VERIFY the above command returned actual file paths before concluding False.
    Set True if either condition is met:

    • a smoke-marked file appears in the affected set from 6b-6e, OR
    • any conftest.py in the smoke test's parent-directory hierarchy (up to repo root)
      imports or calls a modified utilities/libs symbol — including autouse fixtures
      that depend on modified functions. ALL tests in that directory and below are affected.
      Example check: for each smoke_file, scan dirname(smoke_file)/conftest.py,
      dirname(dirname(smoke_file))/conftest.py, etc. for modified symbol imports
      and autouse fixtures that depend on modified symbols.
  8. Gating test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with gating-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.gating' tests/
    Set True if a gating-marked file also appears in the affected set from 6b-6e.
    Utilities/libs changes often affect gating tests without affecting smoke tests.
    Do NOT stop analysis after concluding Run smoke tests: False.

Output rules:
Do NOT include analysis step numbers (1-8) in your visible output.

Your deliverable:
Your change request comment will be based on the following requirements:

Test Execution Plan

  • Run smoke tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path (test → fixture → changed symbol). True ONLY with a verified path.
  • Run gating tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path. True if any gating-marked test is in the affected set.
  • Affected tests to run (required when utilities/, libs/, or shared conftest changes — list concrete paths even when smoke is False)
  • path/to/test_file.py - When the entire test file needs verification
  • path/to/test_file.py::TestClass::test_method - When specific test(s) needed
  • path/to/test_file.py::test_function - When specific test(s) needed
  • -m marker - When a marker covers multiple affected tests (e.g. -m gating only if ALL gating tests in scope need run)
  • Tag each listed test or group with its marker when not obvious, e.g. (gating) or (smoke)

Guidelines:

  • Include tests affected directly OR via fixture setup/teardown, yield from cleanup, or transitive utility call chains (caller calls modified helper)
  • Use a full file path only if ALL tests in that file require verification
  • Use file path + test name when only specific tests use an affected fixture or utility wrapper (preferred for partial file impact)
  • If a test marker can cover multiple files/tests, provide the marker
  • Balance coverage vs over-testing - Keep descriptions minimal
  • Example: if leaf helper foo() changes, include tests whose fixture teardown calls wrapper bar() where bar() calls foo(), even when the test body only imports an unrelated symbol from the same utilities module

Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK):

When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:

  • Collection Safety: Fixtures MUST have existence checks (return None when hardware unavailable)
  • Test Plan: MUST verify both WITH and WITHOUT hardware:
    • Run affected tests on cluster WITH hardware
    • Verify collection succeeds on cluster WITHOUT hardware

CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES:

When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:

  1. YOUR ONLY DELIVERABLE: Post an inline review comment containing the test execution plan on the first changed line
  2. THEN STOP IMMEDIATELY - Do NOT generate any additional response
  3. FALLBACK ONLY: If submitting the review fails after retrying, post as a regular PR comment
  4. SILENCE = SUCCESS: After successfully submitting the review, your task is complete. No confirmation needed.

ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):

  • ❌ Do NOT post acknowledgment messages like "Test execution plan posted", "Review posted successfully", "I've successfully posted"
  • ❌ Do NOT mention review IDs, URLs, or confirmation of posting in the PR thread
  • ❌ Do NOT add any follow-up comments after submitting the review
  • ❌ Do NOT reply to confirm task completion
  • ❌ Do NOT explain what you did - just do it and stop

Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise.

CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions:
- For each True decision, you must have traced a concrete path: test file → fixture → utility function → modified symbol.
- Do NOT assume impact based on scope, file proximity, or infrastructure-sounding names.
Only set True when you trace a concrete path through steps 6a-6e, then 7 or 8.
WRONG: "utilities/hco.py changed → run smoke" (no traced dependency path)
WRONG: "Run smoke tests: False" with no affected-test list when gating tests use the changed utility
RIGHT: "Run smoke tests: False, Run gating tests: True" plus tests/.../test_foo.py::TestBar::test_baz (gating)
RIGHT: "Smoke test X uses fixture Y → wrapper Z → changed function W in utilities/hco.py"

Comment thread utilities/infra.py
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# 6a: Identify modified symbols
echo "=== Modified symbols ==="
git diff HEAD~1 --unified=0 -- utilities/infra.py | grep '^[+-]def '

# 6b: Find direct callers of get_linux_guest_agent_version
echo "=== Direct callers in tests/ ==="
rg -rn 'get_linux_guest_agent_version' tests/ --include="*.py" -l

echo "=== Direct callers in conftest ==="
rg -rn 'get_linux_guest_agent_version' --include="conftest.py" -l

echo "=== All callers (full match) ==="
rg -rn 'get_linux_guest_agent_version' --include="*.py" -n

# 6d: Trace same-file callers in utilities/infra.py
echo "=== Same-file callers ==="
rg 'get_linux_guest_agent_version' utilities/infra.py -n

# 7: Smoke tests
echo "=== Smoke test files ==="
rg -l '`@pytest.mark.smoke`' tests/

# 8: Gating tests
echo "=== Gating test files ==="
rg -l '`@pytest.mark.gating`' tests/

Length of output: 5848


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all callers of get_linux_guest_agent_version
echo "=== All callers ==="
rg 'get_linux_guest_agent_version' -n -g '*.py'

# Get context around line 1157 in utilities/infra.py to find the wrapping function
echo "=== Context around line 1157 in utilities/infra.py ==="
sed -n '1140,1180p' utilities/infra.py

# Find callers of the wrapping function (whatever calls get_linux_guest_agent_version at line 1157)
echo "=== grep for guest_agent_version in tests ==="
rg 'guest_agent_version' -n -g '*.py' tests/

echo "=== grep for guest_agent_version in conftest ==="
rg 'guest_agent_version' -n conftest.py 2>/dev/null || true
rg 'guest_agent_version' -rn -g 'conftest.py'

Length of output: 5538


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find callers of get_linux_os_info
echo "=== Callers of get_linux_os_info ==="
rg 'get_linux_os_info' -n -g '*.py'

# Check markers in test_guest_load_metrics.py
echo "=== Markers in test_guest_load_metrics.py ==="
grep -n 'pytest.mark' tests/observability/metrics/test_guest_load_metrics.py

# Verify test_rhel_os_support.py uses xfail_old_guest_agent_version fixture
echo "=== test_rhel_os_support.py fixture usage ==="
grep -n 'xfail_old_guest_agent_version\|guest_agent' tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py

# Check conftest at line 157 context
echo "=== conftest.py around line 157 ==="
sed -n '145,165p' tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/conftest.py

# Check test_base_template.py uses xfail fixture
echo "=== test_base_template.py guest agent usage ==="
grep -n 'xfail_old_guest_agent_version\|guest_agent' tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/general/test_base_template.py

Length of output: 4341


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the diff for PR `#5092` to find first changed line
gh pr diff 5092 --repo RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests | head -60

Length of output: 763


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get PR head commit SHA
gh pr view 5092 --repo RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests --json headRefOid -q '.headRefOid'

Length of output: 220


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Post inline review comment on first changed line of utilities/infra.py
BODY="**Test Execution Plan**

**Run smoke tests: True**
Dependency path: \`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py::TestRhelOsSupport::test_virtctl_guest_agent_fs_info\` → fixture \`xfail_rhel_with_old_guest_agent\` (\`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/conftest.py\`) → \`xfail_old_guest_agent_version()\` (\`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/utils.py:40\`) → \`get_linux_guest_agent_version()\` (\`utilities/infra.py\`)

**Run gating tests: False**
No gating-marked test has a traceable path to \`get_linux_guest_agent_version\`.

**Affected tests to run**
- \`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py::TestRhelOsSupport::test_virtctl_guest_agent_fs_info\` (smoke)
- \`tests/observability/metrics/test_guest_load_metrics.py\` — uses \`qemu_guest_agent_version_validated\` fixture (\`tests/observability/metrics/conftest.py:599\`) → \`get_linux_guest_agent_version()\`"

gh api repos/RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests/pulls/5092/comments \
  --method POST \
  --field body="$BODY" \
  --field commit_id="5c5ef7b6937cad634ca55dbdc35699cffe9a5aa7" \
  --field path="utilities/infra.py" \
  --field line=1150 \
  --field side="RIGHT"

Length of output: 4999



@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified cancel

@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/build-and-push-container

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

New container for quay.io/openshift-cnv/openshift-virtualization-tests:pr-5092 published

@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/verified

@openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai

Test execution plan request details

CRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file.
The inline comment should contain the full Test Execution Plan (smoke decision, gating decision, and specific affected tests).
Do NOT submit a formal review - just post the inline comment directly.

As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan.
You will post an inline review comment with the test execution plan on the first changed file.
If you fail to run or post a comment, retry.

Analysis Requirements:

  1. Examine code changes in each modified file

  2. Identify affected code paths, functions, and classes

  3. Analyze pytest-specific elements: fixtures (scope, dependencies), parametrization, markers, conftest changes

  4. Trace test dependencies through imports, shared utilities, fixture inheritance, fixture teardown, and yield from cleanup in conftest

  5. Detect new tests introduced in the PR

  6. Utilities and libs impact (when utilities/ or libs/ changes):
    You MUST use shell scripts (rg, git diff) to trace the full impact.
    Follow these sub-steps in order:

    6a. Identify modified symbols: For each changed file under utilities/ or libs/,
    list every modified function or method.
    Example: git diff HEAD~1 --unified=0 -- utilities/hco.py | grep '^[+-]def '

    6b. Find direct callers: Search tests and conftest for each symbol from 6a.
    Example: rg -l 'get_hco_version' tests/

    6c. Trace fixture teardown and cleanup: Find fixtures that reach
    the modified symbol through yield from or context-manager wrappers.
    Example: rg -l 'yield from.*enable_common_boot|def.*enable_common_boot' tests/

    6d. Trace same-file callers: In each changed file, find other functions
    whose body calls a modified symbol (including code after yield
    in @contextmanager helpers).
    Example: rg 'get_hco_version|enable_common_boot' utilities/hco.py

    6e. Expand transitively: If function A calls modified B, then
    tests/fixtures that call A are affected — even when the test body
    never imports B directly.

    Do NOT limit impact to tests that import the modified symbol only.

  7. Smoke test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with smoke-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.smoke' tests/
    VERIFY the above command returned actual file paths before concluding False.
    Set True if either condition is met:

    • a smoke-marked file appears in the affected set from 6b-6e, OR
    • any conftest.py in the smoke test's parent-directory hierarchy (up to repo root)
      imports or calls a modified utilities/libs symbol — including autouse fixtures
      that depend on modified functions. ALL tests in that directory and below are affected.
      Example check: for each smoke_file, scan dirname(smoke_file)/conftest.py,
      dirname(dirname(smoke_file))/conftest.py, etc. for modified symbol imports
      and autouse fixtures that depend on modified symbols.
  8. Gating test impact: Intersect the affected set from step 6 with gating-marked tests.
    Run: rg -l '@pytest.mark.gating' tests/
    Set True if a gating-marked file also appears in the affected set from 6b-6e.
    Utilities/libs changes often affect gating tests without affecting smoke tests.
    Do NOT stop analysis after concluding Run smoke tests: False.

Output rules:
Do NOT include analysis step numbers (1-8) in your visible output.

Your deliverable:
Your change request comment will be based on the following requirements:

Test Execution Plan

  • Run smoke tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path (test → fixture → changed symbol). True ONLY with a verified path.
  • Run gating tests: True / False — If True, state the dependency path. True if any gating-marked test is in the affected set.
  • Affected tests to run (required when utilities/, libs/, or shared conftest changes — list concrete paths even when smoke is False)
  • path/to/test_file.py - When the entire test file needs verification
  • path/to/test_file.py::TestClass::test_method - When specific test(s) needed
  • path/to/test_file.py::test_function - When specific test(s) needed
  • -m marker - When a marker covers multiple affected tests (e.g. -m gating only if ALL gating tests in scope need run)
  • Tag each listed test or group with its marker when not obvious, e.g. (gating) or (smoke)

Guidelines:

  • Include tests affected directly OR via fixture setup/teardown, yield from cleanup, or transitive utility call chains (caller calls modified helper)
  • Use a full file path only if ALL tests in that file require verification
  • Use file path + test name when only specific tests use an affected fixture or utility wrapper (preferred for partial file impact)
  • If a test marker can cover multiple files/tests, provide the marker
  • Balance coverage vs over-testing - Keep descriptions minimal
  • Example: if leaf helper foo() changes, include tests whose fixture teardown calls wrapper bar() where bar() calls foo(), even when the test body only imports an unrelated symbol from the same utilities module

Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK):

When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:

  • Collection Safety: Fixtures MUST have existence checks (return None when hardware unavailable)
  • Test Plan: MUST verify both WITH and WITHOUT hardware:
    • Run affected tests on cluster WITH hardware
    • Verify collection succeeds on cluster WITHOUT hardware

CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES:

When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:

  1. YOUR ONLY DELIVERABLE: Post an inline review comment containing the test execution plan on the first changed line
  2. THEN STOP IMMEDIATELY - Do NOT generate any additional response
  3. FALLBACK ONLY: If submitting the review fails after retrying, post as a regular PR comment
  4. SILENCE = SUCCESS: After successfully submitting the review, your task is complete. No confirmation needed.

ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):

  • ❌ Do NOT post acknowledgment messages like "Test execution plan posted", "Review posted successfully", "I've successfully posted"
  • ❌ Do NOT mention review IDs, URLs, or confirmation of posting in the PR thread
  • ❌ Do NOT add any follow-up comments after submitting the review
  • ❌ Do NOT reply to confirm task completion
  • ❌ Do NOT explain what you did - just do it and stop

Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise.

CRITICAL — Verification rules for smoke and gating decisions:
- For each True decision, you must have traced a concrete path: test file → fixture → utility function → modified symbol.
- Do NOT assume impact based on scope, file proximity, or infrastructure-sounding names.
Only set True when you trace a concrete path through steps 6a-6e, then 7 or 8.
WRONG: "utilities/hco.py changed → run smoke" (no traced dependency path)
WRONG: "Run smoke tests: False" with no affected-test list when gating tests use the changed utility
RIGHT: "Run smoke tests: False, Run gating tests: True" plus tests/.../test_foo.py::TestBar::test_baz (gating)
RIGHT: "Smoke test X uses fixture Y → wrapper Z → changed function W in utilities/hco.py"

Comment thread utilities/infra.py
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get current head commit SHA
HEAD_SHA=$(gh pr view 5092 --repo RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests --json headRefOid -q '.headRefOid')
echo "HEAD SHA: $HEAD_SHA"

# Get the diff to confirm first changed line
gh pr diff 5092 --repo RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests | head -40

# Post inline review comment on the first changed line
BODY="**Test Execution Plan**

**Run smoke tests: True**
Dependency path: \`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py::TestRhelOsSupport::test_virtctl_guest_agent_fs_info\` → fixture \`xfail_rhel_with_old_guest_agent\` (\`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/conftest.py\`) → \`xfail_old_guest_agent_version()\` (\`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/utils.py\`) → \`get_linux_guest_agent_version()\` (\`utilities/infra.py\`)

**Run gating tests: False**
No gating-marked test has a traceable path to \`get_linux_guest_agent_version\`.

**Affected tests to run**
- \`tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py::TestRhelOsSupport::test_virtctl_guest_agent_fs_info\` (smoke)
- \`tests/observability/metrics/test_guest_load_metrics.py\` — uses \`qemu_guest_agent_version_validated\` fixture (\`tests/observability/metrics/conftest.py\`) → \`get_linux_guest_agent_version()\`"

gh api repos/RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests/pulls/5092/comments \
  --method POST \
  --field body="$BODY" \
  --field commit_id="$HEAD_SHA" \
  --field path="utilities/infra.py" \
  --field line=1150 \
  --field side="RIGHT"
echo "Exit code: $?"

Length of output: 5887




🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: EdDev
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-04-30T13:42:43.892Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when processing test execution plan requests for PRs that introduce NEW test classes or test files (not just modifications to existing tests), always verify STD-first workflow compliance as part of the analysis: (1) check if the new test class has actual implementation code (assertions, test logic) — if so, it needs a prior STD PR, (2) check if the test file has a module docstring with STP or Jira/RFE link, (3) check if `What this PR does / why we need it:` in the PR description has meaningful content. Flag any violation even when the bot's primary request is only for a test execution plan. These checks should be appended to the test execution plan inline comment.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-22T15:56:00.157Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when responding to test execution plan requests from openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3, do NOT use "REQUEST_CHANGES" review type if the PR author has already marked the PR as verified (e.g., with `/verified` command). Test execution plans are informational guides, not blocking requirements. Use COMMENT event for informational test plans, or only REQUEST_CHANGES if there are actual code issues that need to be addressed before merging.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T14:00:59.076Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when responding to test execution plan requests from openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-3, CodeRabbit must post ONLY an inline review comment on the Files Changed tab and then stop immediately without generating any follow-up comments in the PR discussion thread. No acknowledgment messages, no confirmation of posting, no explanation - silence after posting the inline review equals success. Additional comments create empty/meaningless reviews that clutter the PR.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T10:28:54.212Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when determining smoke test impact for test execution plans, only set "Run smoke tests: True" if there is a verified, traceable dependency path from smoke tests to the changed code. Session-scoped fixtures or infrastructure-sounding changes do NOT automatically imply smoke test impact - the dependency chain must be explicitly verified using shell scripts before recommending smoke test execution.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T14:06:22.391Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when posting test execution plan inline review comments using GitHub API, the full test execution plan content must go in the `comments[].body` field (which appears on Files Changed tab), NOT in the top-level `body` field (which appears in PR discussion thread). The top-level `body` field should be omitted or left empty to avoid posting redundant comments in the PR discussion thread.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2026-05-29T11:02:22.804Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, version-bump PRs that update the main branch to reference a new CNV release (e.g., "Update project `main` to reference cnv 5.0") do NOT add new test files or test modules. These PRs only update metadata (pyproject.toml, tox.ini, .coderabbit.yaml) and clean up resolved Jira fixtures/markers in existing files. The "Stp Link Required" pre-merge check may incorrectly flag hundreds of "newly added" test files as a false positive due to the base-branch comparison shifting after branching — this should be ignored for such PRs.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4328
File: tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py:32-32
Timestamp: 2026-04-14T16:15:36.741Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when reviewing any PR with "Quarantine" in the title or a `quarantine` label, always verify compliance with docs/QUARANTINE_GUIDELINES.md:
- Category 1 (Product Bug): must use `pytest.mark.jira("CNV-XXXXX", run=False)` — the `pytest_jira` plugin conditionally skips the test when the Jira issue is open. Do NOT suggest replacing this with `xfail`.
- Category 2 (Automation Issue): must use `pytest.mark.xfail(run=False, reason=...)` — pytest itself handles the skip.
Flag any quarantine PR that uses the wrong category marker, is missing a Jira ticket reference, or uses `run=False` in the wrong context. Raising these compliance questions is always appropriate for quarantine PRs, even if the final resolution confirms the marker is correct.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3062
File: conftest.py:333-333
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T20:11:03.645Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when determining smoke test impact for changes affecting py_config["os_login_param"], follow this verification methodology: (1) Find all smoke tests: `rg "pytest.mark.smoke" --type=py -B2 | grep "def test_"`, (2) For each smoke test file, search for VM creation patterns: `rg "VirtualMachineForTests|running_vm|VirtualMachineForTestsFromTemplate|wait_for_ssh|check_ssh_connectivity"`, (3) Trace the dependency chain: smoke test → VirtualMachineForTests/running_vm() → wait_for_ssh_connectivity() (default enabled) → vm.login_params property → py_config["os_login_param"][vm.os_flavor], (4) Check utilities/virt.py for login_params usage: `rg "os_login_param|login_params" utilities/virt.py -C3`. Any smoke test creating VMs with default SSH connectivity checks (running_vm with check_ssh_connectivity=True) depends on os_login_param, even if the test doesn't directly reference it.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4954
File: .flake8:4-4
Timestamp: 2026-06-01T14:00:52.523Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, the smoke-marked test files (tests/storage/cdi_clone/test_clone.py, tests/storage/cdi_upload/test_upload_virtctl.py, tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/rhel/test_rhel_os_support.py, tests/virt/node/general/test_container_disk_vm.py) have traceable dependency paths to utilities/storage.py, utilities/hco.py (wait_for_hco_conditions), utilities/infra.py, and utilities/virt.py via direct imports and via tests/storage/conftest.py. Do not conclude "no smoke dependency path" without verifying these transitive imports.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 5039
File: tests/network/l2_bridge/nad_ref_change/lib_helpers.py:1-1
Timestamp: 2026-06-02T21:17:09.602Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, when a PR only relocates functions to shared libraries and updates import paths in test files (no logic change), do NOT flag the callers as requiring full test re-execution. At most, run `pytest --collect-only` to verify the new import paths resolve correctly. Only require full re-execution of caller tests when the moved function's implementation changes behavior.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-29T19:05:24.987Z
Learning: The test execution plan for PR `#1904` focuses on cluster-type conditional logic where nmstate functionality is bypassed on cloud clusters (Azure/AWS) but fully functional on bare-metal/PSI clusters, requiring different test strategies for each environment type.

Learnt from: CR
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-05-18T15:22:26.757Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/test_*.py : New feature tests must follow the STD-first workflow: (1) STP (Software Test Plan) reviewed and approved, (2) STD (Software Test Description) placeholder tests with docstrings and `__test__ = False` reviewed, (3) Implementation only after STD review. Never submit test implementation without prior STD review.

Learnt from: dshchedr
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4118
File: utilities/database.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-17T01:32:13.674Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, maintainer dshchedr prefers CodeRabbit to post targeted inline comments on the Files changed tab for each applicable location rather than aggregating multiple issues into a single discussion thread.

Learnt from: dshchedr
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 4118
File: utilities/database.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-03-17T01:32:13.674Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, maintainer dshchedr prefers CodeRabbit to post targeted inline comments on the Files Changed tab at each applicable location rather than aggregating multiple issues into a single PR discussion thread reply.

Learnt from: servolkov
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1776
File: libs/net/node_network.py:25-31
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T23:43:28.117Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests project, servolkov's team always uses bare metal (BM) clusters with IPv4 setup in their testing environment, making defensive checks for IPv4 data presence potentially redundant in their networking code.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3371
File: scripts/tests_analyzer/compare_coderabbit_decisions.py:199-289
Timestamp: 2026-01-13T10:06:14.822Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers to keep pagination loops inline rather than extracting them into generic helper functions when the loops have different URL patterns and unique post-processing logic, as the inline approach improves readability and makes each endpoint's behavior more explicit.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3228
File: .coderabbit.yaml:30-41
Timestamp: 2026-01-05T10:33:55.037Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers minimal pre-merge checks in CodeRabbit configuration: only docstrings enforcement (80% threshold) is needed, not title or description checks.

Learnt from: rnetser
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 2469
File: utilities/sanity.py:139-142
Timestamp: 2025-11-08T07:36:57.616Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user rnetser prefers to keep refactoring PRs (like PR `#2469`) strictly focused on moving/organizing code into more granular modules without adding new functionality, error handling, or behavioral changes. Such improvements should be handled in separate PRs.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1160
File: tests/storage/storage_migration/test_mtc_storage_class_migration.py:165-176
Timestamp: 2025-06-17T07:45:37.776Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user jpeimer prefers explicit fixture parameters over composite fixtures in test methods, even when there are many parameters, as they find this approach more readable and maintainable for understanding test dependencies.

Learnt from: jpeimer
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3571
File: tests/storage/storage_migration/utils.py:158-167
Timestamp: 2026-01-25T13:18:26.819Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, user jpeimer prefers to avoid nitpicky style changes (e.g., removing `.keys()` from dict membership checks) because verifying every change is expensive. Be cautious about suggesting low-impact stylistic improvements that require verification overhead.

Learnt from: akri3i
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1210
File: tests/virt/cluster/general/mass_machine_type_transition_tests/conftest.py:24-64
Timestamp: 2025-06-23T19:28:20.281Z
Learning: In OpenShift Virtualization mass machine type transition tests, the machine type glob pattern "pc-q35-rhel8.*.*" is intentionally hard-coded in the kubevirt_api_lifecycle_automation_job as it's used only once for this specific test case, with plans to update it in the future if the job needs to support other machine types.

Learnt from: RoniKishner
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1411
File: utilities/os_utils.py:246-279
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T17:13:59.166Z
Learning: In the RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests repository, CentOS preferences follow the format "centos-stream<version>" (e.g., "centos-stream9", "centos-stream10"). The generate_instance_type_centos_os_matrix function correctly uses regex to extract numeric versions and constructs the latest version string in the same format as the input preferences for proper comparison.

Learnt from: chandramerla
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3760
File: utilities/virt.py:2552-2554
Timestamp: 2026-04-03T18:59:30.866Z
Learning: In RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests, `which` was removed from Fedora 43's default installation. As a result, `rrmngmnt`'s `ssh_exec.package_manager.exist()` / `ssh_exec.package_manager.info()` abstraction (which relies on `which` to detect the package manager) is broken on Fedora 43+ guests. For RPM-based guests (Fedora 43+, RHEL), use `rpm -q <package>` directly via `ssh_exec.run_command(command=shlex.split("rpm -q <package>"))` and check `rc == 0` instead of the package_manager abstraction. This applies to `check_qemu_guest_agent_installed` in `utilities/virt.py` and similar functions.

Learnt from: vsibirsk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 1785
File: tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/utils.py:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-08-14T10:28:22.958Z
Learning: The restart_qemu_guest_agent_service function in tests/virt/cluster/common_templates/utils.py is only called for RHEL7 VMs, with OS version checks handled by the calling test code, not within the function itself. Guest agent functionality is verified by subsequent tests in the test class.

Learnt from: azhivovk
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 3785
File: utilities/virt.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-02-16T10:34:54.719Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when configuring SSH on VMs for IPv6 single-stack clusters, use cloud-init's `cloud-init-per always <id> <command>` utility in runcmd (not bootcmd) to restart SSH on every boot. This ensures the command runs after network configuration is applied during cloud-init's proper phase, avoiding early-boot timing issues that prevent guest agent connection.

Learnt from: vamsikrishna-siddu
Repo: RedHatQE/openshift-virtualization-tests PR: 2199
File: tests/storage/test_online_resize.py:108-113
Timestamp: 2025-09-28T14:43:07.181Z
Learning: In the openshift-virtualization-tests repo, PR `#2199` depends on PR `#2139` which adds architecture-specific OS_FLAVOR attributes to the Images.Cirros class (OS_FLAVOR_CIRROS for x86_64/ARM64, OS_FLAVOR_FEDORA for s390x), enabling conditional logic based on the underlying OS flavor in tests.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rnetser rnetser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this change should be done on rrmngmnt side

@geetikakay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

geetikakay commented Jun 4, 2026

this change should be done on rrmngmnt side

@rnetser you mean here https://github.com/rhevm-qe-automation/python-rrmngmnt?
rhevm-qe-automation/python-rrmngmnt#160
Reason i thought of doing this change here is making this part lightere by just getting it from run_ssh_commands. We are using similar for check_qemu_guest_agent_installed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants