Changed the simple_form class to properly convert variables to their htm...#8
Open
genixpro wants to merge 1 commit intoPylons:masterfrom
Open
Changed the simple_form class to properly convert variables to their htm...#8genixpro wants to merge 1 commit intoPylons:masterfrom
genixpro wants to merge 1 commit intoPylons:masterfrom
Conversation
…html representation using formencode.Validator.from_python.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was having issues because simpleform did not use the formencode.Validator.from_python methods when filling the HTML forms with values. I made changes so that this is the case - so that the system properly switches between the python-style and html-style representations or variables.
My changes could be made better though, as in a couple of places we convert to python representation, back to html representation (see line 198 in the latest update). It seemed like I would have to rewrite the whole function to avoid this.