Skip to content

Conversation

@jsemldonado
Copy link

Summary

  • Fixes incorrect Frobenius automorphism in GoldilocksExt2
  • Old code computed frob(a0 + a1x) = -a0 + a1x (wrong)
  • New code computes frob(a0 + a1x) = a0 - a1x (correct)
  • The bug didn't break inversion because errors cancelled out, but Frobenius was mathematically wrong

Test plan

  • Added 3 tests verifying Frobenius properties:
    • frob^2 == identity
    • frob fixes base field
    • frob(X) == -X
  • All existing goldilocks tests pass
  • All uni_kzg tests pass

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jsemldonado, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical mathematical inaccuracy in the GoldilocksExt2 Frobenius automorphism implementation. The change ensures the Frobenius operation now correctly applies the transformation a0 - a1*x, which is essential for cryptographic primitives relying on finite field arithmetic. The fix is accompanied by new, specific tests to validate the corrected behavior and maintain the integrity of the field operations.

Highlights

  • Frobenius Automorphism Correction: The implementation of the Frobenius automorphism in GoldilocksExt2 was corrected. The old code incorrectly computed frob(a0 + a1*x) = -a0 + a1*x, which has been updated to the mathematically accurate frob(a0 + a1*x) = a0 - a1*x.
  • Mathematical Correctness Ensured: While the previous incorrect implementation did not break inversion due to error cancellation, the new implementation ensures the mathematical correctness of the Frobenius operation, which is critical for field arithmetic.
  • Comprehensive Test Coverage Added: Three new dedicated tests were introduced to rigorously verify key Frobenius properties: frob^2 == identity, frob fixes base field elements, and frob(X) == -X.
  • No Regressions Introduced: All existing Goldilocks and uni_kzg tests continue to pass, confirming that no regressions were introduced by these changes.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes the implementation of the Frobenius automorphism in GoldilocksExt2. The new logic is mathematically sound, and the added tests provide good coverage for the key properties of the Frobenius map. I have one suggestion to make the code more idiomatic and improve readability by removing a magic number.

Comment on lines +385 to +392
// NEG_ONE = p - 1 = -1 mod p
const NEG_ONE: Goldilocks = Goldilocks {
v: 18446744069414584320,
};
for _ in 1..count {
z0 *= Goldilocks {
v: 18446744069414584320,
};
}
let z0square = z0 * z0;

let mut res = [Goldilocks::ZERO; 2];

res[0] = arr[0] * z0;
res[1] = arr[1] * z0square;

Self { v: res }
Self {
v: [arr[0], arr[1] * NEG_ONE],
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve readability and maintainability, you can replace the NEG_ONE constant and its usage with a direct negation. The Neg trait is implemented for Goldilocks, so you can use the - operator. This makes the code more idiomatic and removes the magic number 18446744069414584320.

        Self {
            v: [arr[0], -arr[1]],
        }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant