Skip to content

Document Engine 1.15.0#132

Merged
zrzka merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
zrzka/de-1.15.0
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

Document Engine 1.15.0#132
zrzka merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
zrzka/de-1.15.0

Conversation

@zrzka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zrzka zrzka commented Mar 26, 2026

  • Bump Chart to 8.2.0
  • Update DE version to 1.15.0
  • Introduce configuration options for worker daemon read & write timeouts

[1] #130

@zrzka zrzka mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2026
@zrzka zrzka self-assigned this Mar 26, 2026
@zrzka zrzka requested review from a team and eteubert March 26, 2026 15:00
SERVER_REQUEST_TIMEOUT: {{ mul 1000 .Values.config.requestTimeoutSeconds | quote }}
PSPDFKIT_WORKER_TIMEOUT: {{ mul 1000 .Values.config.workerTimeoutSeconds | quote }}
PSPDFKITD_READ_TIMEOUT: {{ mul 1000 .Values.config.daemonReadTimeoutSeconds | quote }}
PSPDFKITD_WRITE_TIMEOUT: {{ mul 1000 .Values.config.daemonWriteTimeoutSeconds | quote }}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We changed naming convention PSPDFKIT vs PSPDFKITD ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@zrzka zrzka Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we did not. But in configurable options, it's in the daemon section and while it's a subtle difference, it also distinguishes from other timeouts like worker timeout.

### Changed

* [Document Engine 1.15.0](https://www.nutrient.io/guides/document-engine/release-notes/changelog/#1.15.0)
* New options `daemonReadTimeoutSeconds` and `daemonWriteTimeoutSeconds` are available to control the worker daemon socket timeouts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Daemon? What if we have more daemons in the system?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, however we have things like workerTimeoutSeconds where we can apply same logic? For Maestro, Vision, ... we should be more consistent.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tomassurin tomassurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpicks about naming. Keep whatever you like though.

@zrzka zrzka merged commit 4451594 into master Mar 26, 2026
2 checks passed
@zrzka zrzka deleted the zrzka/de-1.15.0 branch March 26, 2026 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants