Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade node-gyp from 9.4.0 to 9.4.1#364

Closed
revagomes wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-upgrade-bef44da9f0c718bd0d14f36839a68c11
Closed

[Snyk] Upgrade node-gyp from 9.4.0 to 9.4.1#364
revagomes wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-upgrade-bef44da9f0c718bd0d14f36839a68c11

Conversation

@revagomes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade node-gyp from 9.4.0 to 9.4.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2023-10-27.
Release notes
Package name: node-gyp
  • 9.4.1 - 2023-10-27

    Bug Fixes

    • Revert "update make-fetch-happen to 11.0.3 (#2796)" (82c2d64)

    Tests

    Miscellaneous

    • add release branches as ci targets (b68da05)
    • add release-please to v9 branch (5a65d03)
    • increase parallel install timeouts (fd77b34)
  • 9.4.0 - 2023-06-13

    Features

    • add support for native windows arm64 build tools (bb76021)
    • Upgrade Python linting from flake8 to ruff (#2815) (fc0ddc6)

    Bug Fixes

    • extract tarball to temp directory on Windows (#2846) (aaa117c)
    • log statement is for devDir not nodedir (#2840) (55048f8)

    Miscellaneous

    • get update-gyp.py to work with Python >= v3.5 (#2826) (337e8e6)

    Doc

    Tests

from node-gyp GitHub release notes

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@revagomes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Outdated

@revagomes revagomes closed this Mar 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants