Revert docs: update maintainer eligibility wording (#420)#422
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit 853696d. Co-authored-by: openhands <openhands@all-hands.dev>
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
enyst
changed the title
all-hands-bot
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2026
Contributor
all-hands-bot
left a comment
all-hands-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Good taste - Clean revert for the right reasons. Rolling back premature documentation while policy is still being discussed is pragmatic engineering.
VERDICT: ✅ Worth merging
KEY INSIGHT: Sometimes the best code review is recognizing when to revert and wait for consensus.
Collaborator
Author
|
@jamiechicago312 Sorry, let’s revert this. I do think we need to consider it thoughtfully. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of changes
overview/contributing.mdxllms-full.txtWhy this revert
Maintainers are currently discussing the criteria for maintainer eligibility, and that discussion has not concluded yet. Because of that, #420 was merged too early and the wording change was too rushed. This reverts the change until that discussion is finished and the criteria are settled.
Reverts #420.