Skip to content

adding phevaluator module functionality and colDefs for all reactables per new result model spec#209

Open
nhall6 wants to merge 12 commits intomainfrom
revert-test
Open

adding phevaluator module functionality and colDefs for all reactables per new result model spec#209
nhall6 wants to merge 12 commits intomainfrom
revert-test

Conversation

@nhall6
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@nhall6 nhall6 commented Oct 11, 2023

No description provided.

@nhall6 nhall6 requested a review from jreps October 11, 2023 14:46
nhall6 and others added 5 commits October 18, 2023 16:40
…) function, ensuring plot will work if no trellises are selected
CG: when cohort inclusion and attrition results are not present, show proper and clean shiny message to the user

Incidence: All standard plots updated
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Nov 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 86 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (99422f4) 78.56% compared to head (b35796a) 78.49%.
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
R/characterization-incidence.R 19.56% 74 Missing ⚠️
R/phevaluator-main.R 75.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
R/cohort-diagnostics-definition.R 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #209      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.56%   78.49%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines       17803    17828      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        13987    13994       +7     
- Misses       3816     3834      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jreps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

jreps commented Jan 22, 2024

@nhall6 is this pull request still needed?

@nhall6
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

nhall6 commented Jan 23, 2024

@nhall6 is this pull request still needed?

Yes I believe so. But we can merge into develop instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants