Skip to content

Use fabsf instead of fabs #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
howard0su wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Use fabsf instead of fabs #12

howard0su wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@howard0su
Copy link

@howard0su howard0su commented Mar 16, 2019

rxcopy is float. the change reduce f2d and d2f calls.

@howard0su howard0su mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2019
Open
@ghostface
Copy link

ghostface commented Apr 12, 2019

I agree this makes sense based on the documentation.
Forgive my ignorance but I am assuming there is no VFP coprocessor on the alienwhoop zer0 or e011c boards so using __fabsf instead of fabsf makes no sense right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@howard0su @ghostface