ImageJ ROIs have inscrutable names #1358
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MarinManuel
changed the title
mrariden
reviewed
Nov 10, 2025
Collaborator
mrariden
left a comment
mrariden
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2 things to amend @MarinManuel.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to be able to compare measurements obtained using ImageJ and using a the _seg.npy directly from a script, but when I ask cellpose to generate ImageJ ROIs, they have uuid names that are very hard to read.
I modified the code to give the ROIs names that correspond to the labels of the masks.
I couldnt test it with a case where empty outlines are present, but hopefully the code works in that case too, and the correspondence is preserved.