Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughInstallation docs now recommend running via uvx/uv tool (default SQLite supported) with examples; pip-based install examples retained and reordered. Packaging metadata in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
bc269a8 to
574593e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/getting-started.md`:
- Around line 7-13: The docs use the wrong uvx invocation ("uvx motley-slayer
serve ...") — replace those lines to call the installed console script name and
add the --from flag to point to the package, e.g. use "uvx --from motley-slayer
slayer serve --models-dir ./slayer_data" (and similarly for the postgres
variant) so the uvx command runs the "slayer" executable from the
"motley-slayer" package.
In `@pyproject.toml`:
- Around line 60-64: Remove the duplicate console script declaration by deleting
the redundant [tool.poetry.scripts] entry that defines slayer =
"slayer.cli:main"; keep only the canonical [project.scripts] section with slayer
= "slayer.cli:main" so the entry point (slayer -> slayer.cli:main) is declared
once. Ensure no other duplicate script entries remain and run your packaging
tool to verify the single entry point is used.
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 49-50: Update the example command so uvx runs the package's entry
point: replace the incorrect "uvx motley-slayer serve --models-dir ./my_models"
with a command that uses the --from flag to load the motley-slayer package and
invoke its slayer entry point, e.g. "uvx --from motley-slayer slayer serve
--models-dir ./my_models"; ensure the README example references uvx, --from,
motley-slayer, and slayer exactly as shown.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 5998125b-04cf-44f4-8b3e-1abece37d371
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.mddocs/getting-started.mdpyproject.toml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@pyproject.toml`:
- Around line 60-61: Update build-system.requires to pin poetry-core to a
minimum version that supports [project.scripts]; change the
build-system.requires entry (currently "poetry-core") to "poetry-core>=2.0.0" so
the CLI entry point under [project.scripts] (slayer = "slayer.cli:main") is
supported across environments.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 044cd4a3-72a4-4644-80c9-2060616e0681
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.mddocs/getting-started.mdpyproject.toml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/getting-started.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- README.md
7c2773e to
a5a026b
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores