feat: update ci

[m-xim]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added support for Python 3.14

• Documentation

  • Updated official documentation URL

• Chores

  • Established automated testing workflow with linting and coverage reporting across Python versions
  • Simplified publishing pipeline with improved distribution validation
  • Modernized codebase for Pydantic v2 compatibility

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1ed776e6-65c2-4517-8bd0-2ed6a6762e8f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR modernizes the PyMax project by adopting uv as the package manager across CI/CD workflows, updating project configuration to support Python 3.14 and contemporary tooling, and migrating the CamelModel to Pydantic v2's ConfigDict API. The publish and test workflows are simplified and standardized around uv, while project metadata and linting configuration are refined.

Changes

Project Modernization

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Publish workflow with uv .github/workflows/publish.yml	Simplified two-job pipeline: package job builds and validates distributions via uv build and twine check, uploads artifacts; publish job downloads and publishes to PyPI using uv publish with PyPI environment/token authentication. Workflow name changed to Publish, concurrency added, permission set to id-token: write.
Tests workflow with uv and Python matrix .github/workflows/tests.yml	New workflow runs lint and tests jobs on pull requests, pushes to main/dev/**, and manual dispatch. Lint job runs ruff format --check and ruff check; tests job runs pytest with coverage across Python 3.10–3.14 matrix, outputting coverage reports to job summary.
Project configuration and tooling pyproject.toml	Added Python 3.14 trove classifier; updated Documentation URL to https://docs.pymax.org; refined [dependency-groups].dev to retain pre-commit, twine, pyright, ruff; added [tool.uv]; updated [tool.ruff] to remove target-version, clear global ignore list, and adjust per-file-ignores (removed src/pymax/**/__init__.py, kept tests/** → F401).
Pydantic v2 ConfigDict migration src/pymax/api/models.py	Updated CamelModel to use Pydantic v2's ConfigDict instead of plain dict for model_config, preserving alias_generator=to_camel, populate_by_name=True, and arbitrary_types_allowed=True settings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Poem

🐰 With uv we race, workflows so clean,
Pydantic v2's way now seen,
Python 3.14 on board,
Linting and testing—all restored!
A modernized codebase, keen and keen! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	No pull request description was provided. The template requires sections for description, change type, related issues, and testing examples, but all are missing.	Add a comprehensive description explaining the new CI/CD workflows, select applicable change types, reference any related issues, and provide testing guidance if applicable.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'feat: update ci' is partially related to the changeset but is overly vague and does not clearly specify what CI updates were made.	Make the title more specific, such as 'feat: add CI workflows for testing and publishing' or 'feat: implement automated testing and package publishing workflows'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/publish.yml:
- Around line 21-25: Replace tag-based GitHub Action references with immutable
commit SHAs: locate the uses lines referencing actions/checkout@v6,
astral-sh/setup-uv@v8.1.0, actions/upload-artifact@v4, and
actions/download-artifact@v4 in the publish workflow and pin each to the
corresponding repository commit SHA (e.g., actions/checkout@<full-sha>) instead
of the tag; update every occurrence of those symbols so the workflow uses full
SHAs for reproducible runs and commit the changed publish.yml.

In @.github/workflows/tests.yml:
- Around line 22-26: Replace the floating GitHub Action tags with immutable
commit SHAs for every occurrence of the actions referenced (specifically the
uses entries "actions/checkout@v6" and "astral-sh/setup-uv@v8.1.0" found in both
the lint and tests job blocks); locate those uses entries and update them to the
corresponding repository@<commit-SHA> values (fetch the latest recommended
commit SHAs from each action's repo/releases page), commit the updated workflow,
and run CI to verify the workflows still function after pinning.

In `@src/pymax/api/models.py`:
- Around line 6-10: Ruff flags formatting in the multi-line ConfigDict call for
model_config; reformat the ConfigDict(...) block so arguments are each on their
own line, the closing parenthesis is on its own line, no trailing whitespace or
extra blank lines remain, and overall alignment matches surrounding code style
(edit the model_config assignment and ConfigDict invocation that uses to_camel,
populate_by_name, and arbitrary_types_allowed).

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5486026b-0bbe-40b9-acb2-513cb7d60c72

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e4e63e and d474c5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/publish.yml
• .github/workflows/tests.yml
• pyproject.toml
• src/pymax/api/models.py