-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Implement ERC draft changes #48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
some-molasses
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
erc/ai-drafts
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | ||
| ERC Informal Plans | ||
| Working Draft | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| The purpose of this document is to serve as a draft of the ERC’s plans, prior to drafting any actual policy change. | ||
| 1. MathSoc Cartoons | ||
| MathSoc Cartoons was originally started by a VPA, hence why it is currently under the VPA. However, it is highly irrelevant to the actual duties of the VPA, barring the fact that the cartoons will often contain somewhat academic content. | ||
|
|
||
| Hence this part of the plan reassigns MathSoc Cartoons as the responsibility of the VPC. | ||
|
|
||
| Realistically, the VPC will do the following with MathSoc Cartoons as MathSoc Cartoons is mostly autonomous: | ||
| Manage & submit their budget where appropriate. | ||
| Be “restarted” should it “fizzle out”. | ||
| Chances are that the VPC’s volunteers would likely be interested in helping it anyway. | ||
| The President is also implicitly going to help out with this, as the President is responsible for supporting all the executives. | ||
| 2. Dissolution of the VPI | ||
| The VPI, broadly speaking, has three responsibilities: | ||
| Management of clubs | ||
| Management of the volunteers of other executives | ||
| Running events | ||
|
|
||
| The third point, “running events”, makes up the bulk of the work in practice, in part because VPIs often sign up to run events so they will naturally wish to run more events. | ||
|
|
||
| Management of clubs, and management of the volunteers of other executives is simply irrelevant to the bulk of the responsibilities of the role. | ||
|
|
||
| Also of note that there are two other roles that run events: | ||
| The president runs mental health events. | ||
| The VPA runs academic events: | ||
| Midterm review sessions | ||
| Final review sessions | ||
| Prof teach-off | ||
| Resume reviews & mock interviews | ||
|
|
||
| Hence the proposition is to: | ||
| Reassign the responsibility of managing clubs to the President | ||
| Reassign management of the volunteers of the other executives to the VPO, since the VPO has the largest number of executives already, and the VPO doesn’t have a particularly heavy workload once the start-of-term buzz is over. | ||
| Place the VPI’s events into a collection that I’ll call “the event pool”. | ||
| Take the president’s mental health events and place them into the event pool. | ||
| Take the VPA’s events and place them into the event pool. | ||
|
|
||
| This leaves the question of who will tackle the events in the aforementioned event pool. This is the subject of the next section. | ||
| 3. Introduction of the Vice Presidents, Events | ||
| All of the events of the society is a massive burden to place upon a single executive. Hence the proposition here, is to create two positions: | ||
| The Vice President, Events (A). | ||
| The Vice President, Events (B). | ||
|
|
||
| Who, as their names imply, will be responsible for running the events of the society. | ||
|
|
||
| To ensure that: | ||
| All important events are run, and | ||
| The balance of work is even between the two Vice Presidents, Events, | ||
| The Vice Presidents, Events, will be required by (policy/bylaws/board procedures?) to submit a motion at the beginning of term to Council, detailing which events each one will run. The motion must pass as part of the responsibilities of the executives. The reason for this is twofold: | ||
| Preassigning events to either role would be poor marketing, as people might get a mixed bag of what they’d like. Allowing the two VPEs to pick would likely make them more enthusiastic about their events. | ||
| Having this as a motion rather than a report allows the council to ensure that the workload is sufficiently balanced between the two executives. If this were simply a report, then one VPE could run 2 events, and leave the other VPE to run the rest. | ||
| Since a report is not a motion that can pass/fail, it would be tricky to define Council’s approval, after all, the executives could simply ignore council’s disapproval of such a report and face no repercussions. | ||
|
|
||
| Hence the VPEs will tackle the aforementioned event pool. A suitable subset of the following will be required by (policy/bylaws/board procedures?) to be present in the total set of events run by both VPEs (the precise subset is to be determined, but it’ll likely be derived from existing responsibilities regarding these events): | ||
| Existing VPI events | ||
| Mental health events | ||
| Academic events | ||
| Intersociety events, such as Soccer, Hockey, etc. | ||
| 4. Analysis | ||
| Let us examine, preliminarily, the difference in the workload for each executive: | ||
| VPF: unchanged. | ||
| Rationale: there are not many responsibilities for the VPF, they are simply large in time and work. For example, cheque requests are consistent throughout the term. | ||
| Splitting these responsibilities would likely cause more accounting issues than help, and is better suited to having multiple volunteers. | ||
| VPC: will receive MathSoc Cartoons. | ||
| Rationale: VPC isn’t an incredibly heavy workload, and MathSoc Cartoons is a mostly autonomous association. | ||
| VPO: will receive the responsibility of volunteer management. | ||
| Rationale: VPO also isn’t an incredibly heavy workload, and this volunteer management responsibility is a one-off somewhat time consuming task. Later on in the term the VPO’s workload becomes much lighter; the start of the term is quite heavy as they need to deal with lockers, volunteer hiring and training, restocking the office, etc. | ||
| VPA: will be alleviated of the academic events. | ||
| Rationale: the VPA isn’t really the best prepared position to run events. The workload of advocacy issues is quite high as-is, and these events are quite orthogonal to the main priority of the VPA which should be academic advocacy. | ||
| President: will be alleviated of mental health events, and be given clubs. | ||
| Rationale: the President is already often the main point of contact for clubs. The President is very much a “run around and put out fires” kind of role, and clubs are very flammable in this analogy. | ||
| Mental health events could sensibly be either the President’s responsibility (due to the mental health nature) or the VPEs’ responsibility (due to the event nature), but the President’s role isn’t exactly light, and with the introduction of the two VPEs, we’ll likely have the manpower there to help (in terms of volunteers) and plan (in terms of executives). | ||
| VPI: dissolved. | ||
| VPEs: handle all events. | ||
| Rationale: An effective VPI in the past would make good use of volunteers to run events, and would spend a great deal of time planning and budgeting events. Having this pool of volunteers to help with the other events would be incredibly useful, and planning the non-traditionally-VPI events is quite similar to planning any other events. | ||
| Obviously having all of the events run by a single executive would be a maddening amount of work. VPI is an incredibly heavy workload mainly because of the events the role must run. Hence, having two executives would considerably alleviate the workload, and allow for more breathing room, and even space for more events should they desire. | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we'll delete this file before merging the rest of the changes :)