Skip to content

Enhance ACT.md with cognitive bias details and examples#32

Merged
sebdraven merged 5 commits intomainfrom
BartM82-patch-5
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

Enhance ACT.md with cognitive bias details and examples#32
sebdraven merged 5 commits intomainfrom
BartM82-patch-5

Conversation

@BartM82
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@BartM82 BartM82 commented Nov 23, 2025

Added detailed explanations and examples for various cognitive biases, including overconfidence, the Peltzman effect, and social proof bias. Expanded sections on commitment techniques and psychological principles related to marketing and decision-making.

Added detailed explanations and examples for various cognitive biases, including overconfidence, the Peltzman effect, and social proof bias. Expanded sections on commitment techniques and psychological principles related to marketing and decision-making.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request enhances the ACT.md file by adding comprehensive details about cognitive biases and psychological manipulation techniques. The document catalogs various tactics and techniques related to influence and decision-making, structured in French with detailed explanations, real-world examples, and academic references.

Changes:

  • Added detailed definitions, examples, and psychological foundations for 13 cognitive bias techniques
  • Expanded existing sections with structured examples, academic references, and contextual applications
  • Enhanced documentation with citations from foundational psychology research (Cialdini, Kahneman & Tversky, Milgram, etc.)

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
Comment on lines +62 to +80
- Principe d'autorité de Cialdini## TE0423 : biais preuve sociale artificielle
Tendance des individus à adopter les comportements des autres en situation d'incertitude. La preuve sociale artificielle cherche à exploiter cette tendance en donnant l'illusion d'un consencus ou d'un comportement massivement partagé.

## TE0423 : Biais de la preuve sociale artificielle

Création d'une illusion de consensus ou de popularité pour influencer la décision individuelle. Exploitation du fait que les gens ont tendance à suivre les actions de la masse.

**Exemples:**
- "Des millions de personnes nous font confiance"
- "Le plus populaire de sa catégorie"
- "Tout le monde utilise ce produit/service"
- "Tendance virale sur les réseaux"

**Références:**
- Principe de preuve sociale de Cialdini
- Expériences d'Asch sur le conformisme (1951)

**Note:** Différent de la preuve sociale authentique - ici il y a manipulation ou fabrication des données de popularité.

Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 18, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate section definition. The section "## TE0423 : biais preuve sociale artificielle" is defined twice (lines 62-63 and 65-80) with slightly different content and formatting. These duplicate definitions should be consolidated into a single section.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
Comment thread ACT/ACT.md Outdated
sebdraven and others added 4 commits February 18, 2026 18:23
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@sebdraven sebdraven merged commit 6920365 into main Feb 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants