feat(positioning): evidence-first public copy for v0.8.1 (T-V06-012)#512
feat(positioning): evidence-first public copy for v0.8.1 (T-V06-012)#512Luis85 wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Updates the product page lead and README "What You Get" section with evidence-backed claims for work shipped in v0.6 (golden-path proof, cross-tool adapters, adoption profiles, agentic security review path). Hook-pack positioning is deliberately omitted until v0.7 per scope-cut verdict recorded in version-0-6-plan/workflow-state.md. Closes T-V06-012 (SPEC-V06-007 — evidence-first public positioning). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@codex review Generated by Claude Code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3f323f51a2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…6-012) Hook-pack positioning omitted per scope-cut verdict; hook packs deferred until v0.7. Removes the premature public claim from the README roadmap. https://claude.ai/code/session_011TPNgd7jBv3ySSyvaTifA1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3b260848ed
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Generated by Claude Code |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Corrects v0.6 roadmap row — the plan is in the release stage, not done. Also restores the missing "types": ["node"] compiler option that was absent from this branch but present on develop. https://claude.ai/code/session_011TPNgd7jBv3ySSyvaTifA1
|
@codex review Generated by Claude Code |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Generated by Claude Code |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0238b28a18
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| | v0.6.0 | Done | Astro product page — `sites/index.html` replaced by Astro 6 build, repo-driven sections (landing / tour / tracker / info hub), brand-token bridge, and dynamic Pages base ([#335](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/335)) | | ||
| | v0.6 | Active | [Cross-tool adapters, live proof, hooks, and security](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/91) | | ||
| | v0.6 | Release-ready | [Cross-tool adapters, live proof, adoption profiles, agentic security, ISO 9001:2026 watch item](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/91) | | ||
| | v0.8.1 | In progress | Consolidation patch: closes out v0.6 plan artifacts (stages 8–10), tiered verify gate, backlog mirror, template init fixes | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore canonical v0.8.1 roadmap focus
The new v0.8.1 roadmap row redefines that release as a “v0.6 consolidation patch”, but the repo’s own planning artifacts still define v0.8.1 as the product-box release tied to issue #145 (see docs/backlog/145-v0-8-1-product-box-feature.md lines 56–60 and roadmaps/specorator/roadmap-board.md line 47). This mismatch can misroute contributors and makes release-readiness tracking ambiguous because downstream docs treat v0.8.1 as a distinct dependency in the version chain.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Closes T-V06-012 (SPEC-V06-007 — evidence-first public positioning). Updates product page and README with evidence-backed claims for work shipped in the v0.6 plan.
sites/src/pages/index.astro): updated from generic workflow description to cite live verified examples, cross-tool adapters (Copilot/Codex/Cursor), adoption profiles, and OWASP-aligned agentic security review pathexamples/,docs/adapters.md,docs/adoption-profiles/,docs/agentic-security-review.md)What is intentionally absent
Hook-pack positioning omitted per scope-cut verdict (PR-D/T-V06-008/009 shipped advisory but public claims wait for v0.7 per
workflow-state.mdnote from 2026-05-02).Traceability
specs/version-0-6-plan/review.mdTest plan
npm run verify— green (114.2s)npm run sites:build— green (7.36s, 1 page built)🤖 Generated with Claude Code