Skip to content

feat(positioning): evidence-first public copy for v0.8.1 (T-V06-012)#512

Open
Luis85 wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/v081-product-page
Open

feat(positioning): evidence-first public copy for v0.8.1 (T-V06-012)#512
Luis85 wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/v081-product-page

Conversation

@Luis85
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@Luis85 Luis85 commented May 14, 2026

Summary

Closes T-V06-012 (SPEC-V06-007 — evidence-first public positioning). Updates product page and README with evidence-backed claims for work shipped in the v0.6 plan.

  • Product page lead (sites/src/pages/index.astro): updated from generic workflow description to cite live verified examples, cross-tool adapters (Copilot/Codex/Cursor), adoption profiles, and OWASP-aligned agentic security review path
  • README "What You Get": four new bullet points linking to the shipped artifacts (examples/, docs/adapters.md, docs/adoption-profiles/, docs/agentic-security-review.md)
  • README Roadmap: v0.6 marked Done; v0.8.1 entry added as in-progress consolidation patch

What is intentionally absent

Hook-pack positioning omitted per scope-cut verdict (PR-D/T-V06-008/009 shipped advisory but public claims wait for v0.7 per workflow-state.md note from 2026-05-02).

Traceability

  • Satisfies: REQ-V06-010 (SPEC-V06-007), NFR-V06-005
  • Closes: FINDING-V06-002 from specs/version-0-6-plan/review.md

Test plan

  • npm run verify — green (114.2s)
  • npm run sites:build — green (7.36s, 1 page built)
  • Product page lead updated and evidence-backed (no unsupported claims)
  • Hook-pack claims absent

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Updates the product page lead and README "What You Get" section with
evidence-backed claims for work shipped in v0.6 (golden-path proof,
cross-tool adapters, adoption profiles, agentic security review path).

Hook-pack positioning is deliberately omitted until v0.7 per scope-cut
verdict recorded in version-0-6-plan/workflow-state.md.

Closes T-V06-012 (SPEC-V06-007 — evidence-first public positioning).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Luis85 commented May 14, 2026

@codex review


Generated by Claude Code

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3f323f51a2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
…6-012)

Hook-pack positioning omitted per scope-cut verdict; hook packs deferred
until v0.7. Removes the premature public claim from the README roadmap.

https://claude.ai/code/session_011TPNgd7jBv3ySSyvaTifA1
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3b260848ed

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Luis85 commented May 14, 2026

@codex review


Generated by Claude Code

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Corrects v0.6 roadmap row — the plan is in the release stage, not done.
Also restores the missing "types": ["node"] compiler option that was
absent from this branch but present on develop.

https://claude.ai/code/session_011TPNgd7jBv3ySSyvaTifA1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Luis85 commented May 14, 2026

@codex review


Generated by Claude Code

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Luis85 commented May 14, 2026

@codex review


Generated by Claude Code

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0238b28a18

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md
| v0.6.0 | Done | Astro product page — `sites/index.html` replaced by Astro 6 build, repo-driven sections (landing / tour / tracker / info hub), brand-token bridge, and dynamic Pages base ([#335](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/335)) |
| v0.6 | Active | [Cross-tool adapters, live proof, hooks, and security](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/91) |
| v0.6 | Release-ready | [Cross-tool adapters, live proof, adoption profiles, agentic security, ISO 9001:2026 watch item](https://github.com/Luis85/agentic-workflow/issues/91) |
| v0.8.1 | In progress | Consolidation patch: closes out v0.6 plan artifacts (stages 8–10), tiered verify gate, backlog mirror, template init fixes |
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore canonical v0.8.1 roadmap focus

The new v0.8.1 roadmap row redefines that release as a “v0.6 consolidation patch”, but the repo’s own planning artifacts still define v0.8.1 as the product-box release tied to issue #145 (see docs/backlog/145-v0-8-1-product-box-feature.md lines 56–60 and roadmaps/specorator/roadmap-board.md line 47). This mismatch can misroute contributors and makes release-readiness tracking ambiguous because downstream docs treat v0.8.1 as a distinct dependency in the version chain.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants