-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
refactor: switch cachex stats to telemetry polling #3156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c969e48
cachex stats
ruslandoga 08553b7
cleanup test
ruslandoga 955ed8e
comment
ruslandoga ca0d8ec
rm ws
ruslandoga f7cadb1
Apply suggestion from @ruslandoga
ruslandoga 4b6a738
Merge branch 'main' into rd/cachex-stats
ruslandoga 4153073
ensure values are numbers
ruslandoga 32fe41a
cleanup cache definition in telemetry
ruslandoga 1dcea9d
keep calling caches metrics
ruslandoga d3a85c3
Merge branch 'main' into rd/cachex-stats
ruslandoga 3ee8420
Merge branch 'main' into rd/cachex-stats
Ziinc 4364625
Merge branch 'main' into rd/cachex-stats
Ziinc 1a68bf7
Merge branch 'main' into rd/cachex-stats
Ziinc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This evaluates to
or should it be hardcoded?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you inverse the logic so that we can do
list_contexts_to_cache()and inlist_cachesit will calllist_contexts_to_cache/0and concat the.CacheThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the module.split isn't very pretty 😆
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
besides that, its fine with keeping it dynamic.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went into a slightly different direction and added
I think it's a bit safer for atoms to exist in the source code.