build(windows): Package Windows driver validation tools

[ReenigneArcher]

Description

Enable BUILD_EXAMPLES for Windows driver CI/docs and build the catalog together with gamepad_adapter so packaging always includes the validation binary. Update Windows packaging to install reviewer-facing test scripts plus tools/windows/gamepad_adapter.exe, and fail configuration if examples are disabled during driver packaging. Also set MSVC static runtime on the core library and example adapters when building the Windows driver to keep runtime linkage consistent for installer artifacts.

Screenshot

Issues Fixed or Closed

Roadmap Issues

Type of Change

• feat: New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• docs: Documentation only changes
• style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semicolons, etc.)
• refactor: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
• perf: Code change that improves performance
• test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
• build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
• ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
• chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
• revert: Reverts a previous commit
• BREAKING CHANGE: Introduces a breaking change (can be combined with any type above)

Checklist

• Code follows the style guidelines of this project
• Code has been self-reviewed
• Code has been commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• Code docstring/documentation-blocks for new or existing methods/components have been added or updated
• Unit tests have been added or updated for any new or modified functionality

AI Usage

• None: No AI tools were used in creating this PR
• Light: AI provided minor assistance (formatting, simple suggestions)
• Moderate: AI helped with code generation or debugging specific parts
• Heavy: AI generated most or all of the code changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (5291f19) to head (e35351e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.81%   89.77%   +1.96%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        4235     4500     +265     
  Branches     1436     1512      +76     
==========================================
+ Hits         3719     4040     +321     
+ Misses        357      295      -62     
- Partials      159      165       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux-Clang	71.09% <ø> (-0.26%)	⬇️
Linux-GCC	83.61% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
Windows-MSVC	90.22% <ø> (+2.39%)	⬆️
Windows-MinGW-UCRT64	82.15% <ø> (+2.47%)	⬆️
macOS	70.52% <ø> (-0.73%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f09ff07...e35351e. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud