Skip to content

Conversation

@aobolensk
Copy link
Contributor

Incorrect value is mistakenly being checked in mul_to_multimul_checker specifically for CPU case

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@IvanYashchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

@KaelanDt, could you please take a look and help merge?

@riccardofelluga riccardofelluga self-requested a review November 20, 2025 14:29
Copy link
Collaborator

@riccardofelluga riccardofelluga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch! Thanks for your contribution! :D

Do you think it would be useful to add an assert to check that multimul is indeed not used when one or more tensors are not on CPU?

@aobolensk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you think it would be useful to add an assert to check that multimul is indeed not used when one or more tensors are not on CPU?

That's possible, but isn't that a purpose of this specific checker (mul_to_multimul_checker) to guardrail that? :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants