chore: bootstrap PR template#44
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 36 minutes and 32 seconds.Comment |
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new pull request template to standardize the contribution process. The review feedback suggests aligning the template's terminology with existing project documentation and updating the checklist to accurately reflect the project's polyglot toolchain, specifically mentioning Rust, Go, and Python testing tools.
| ## Description | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- Describe the goal of this PR. What does it change? Why? --> | ||
| <!-- Include links to related issues or AgilePlus Work Packages (WPs) if applicable. --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The terminology "Work Packages (WPs)" is used here, but CONTRIBUTING.md refers to these as "specs" (e.g., "AgilePlus spec registry") and also mentions "ADRs". Aligning the terminology helps maintain consistency across the project documentation.
| <!-- Include links to related issues or AgilePlus Work Packages (WPs) if applicable. --> | |
| <!-- Include links to related issues, AgilePlus specs, or ADRs if applicable. --> |
| <!-- Review the following before requesting a review or merging. --> | ||
|
|
||
| - [ ] My code follows the project's formatting and style guidelines. | ||
| - [ ] I have run local quality checks (`task quality` / `cargo test` / `npm run lint`). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The checklist mentions task quality and npm run lint, but the CONTRIBUTING.md file indicates this is a polyglot repository using Rust (cargo), Go (go), and Python (uv). The checklist should reflect the actual tools used in the project to avoid confusing contributors.
| - [ ] I have run local quality checks (`task quality` / `cargo test` / `npm run lint`). | |
| - [ ] I have run local quality checks (`cargo test`, `go test`, or `uv run pytest`). |
1 participant
Summary
Bootstrap a standard PR template for consistent pull request hygiene.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Note
Low Risk
Low risk: adds a GitHub PR template only and does not change runtime code, dependencies, or CI behavior.
Overview
Adds a standard
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdto guide PR authors with Description, Type of Change, Checklist, and Additional Notes sections, improving consistency of review information and submission hygiene.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b6c74d0. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.