Old release 3.0 by spbsoluble · Pull Request #171 · Keyfactor/iis-orchestrator

spbsoluble · 2026-01-06T19:51:39Z

No description provided.

* As of this version of the extension, SANs will be handled through the ODKG Enrollment page in Command, and will no longer use the SAN Entry Parameter. This version, we are removing the Entry Parameter "SAN" from the integration-manifest.json, but will still support previous versions of Command in the event the SAN Entry Parameter is passed. The next major version (4.0) will remove all support for the SAN Entry Parameter. * Added WinADFS Store Type for rotating certificates in ADFS environments. Please note, only the service-communications certificate is rotated throughout your farm. * Internal only: Added Integration Tests to aid in future development and testing. * Improved messaging in the event an Entry Parameter is missing (or does not meet the casing requirements) * Fixed the SNI/SSL flag being returned during inventory, now returns extended SSL flags * Fixed the SNI/SSL flag when binding the certificate to allow for extended SSL flags * Added SSL Flag validation to make sure the bit flag is correct. These are the current SSL Flags (NOTE: Values greater than 4 are only supported in IIS 10 version 1809 and higher. The default value is 0): * 0 No SNI * 1 Use SNI * 2 Use Centralized SSL certificate store. * 4 Disable HTTP/2. * 8 Disable OCSP Stapling. * 16 Disable QUIC. * 32 Disable TLS 1.3 over TCP. * 64 Disable Legacy TLS. --------- Co-authored-by: Bob Pokorny <bpokorny@keyfactor.com> Co-authored-by: Keyfactor <keyfactor@keyfactor.github.io> Signed-off-by: Morgan Gangwere <morgan.gangwere@keyfactor.com>

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR adds support for the WinADFS (Active Directory Federation Services) store type to the Windows Certificate Orchestrator Extension. The changes include configuration updates, documentation, new test projects, and removal of the SAN field from WinSQL store type configurations.

Addition of WinADFS store type for managing ADFS Service-Communications certificates
Removal of SAN field from multiple store type configurations in the integration manifest
Addition of unit test projects and test infrastructure
Documentation updates for the new ADFS functionality

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 39 out of 82 changed files in this pull request and generated 38 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
integration-manifest.json	Adds WinADFS store type configuration, removes SAN fields from WinCert and WinSQL store types, updates field descriptions to indicate auto-created fields
docsource/winadfs.md	New documentation file describing WinADFS store type requirements and configuration
docsource/images/*.png	New screenshot images for WinSQL store type dialogs
docsource/content.md	Updates overview to include WinADFS and clarifies job type support per extension
WindowsCertStore.sln	Adds unit test and integration test projects to solution
WindowsCertStore.UnitTests/*.cs	New unit test files for SANs, PowerShell helpers, certificates, and ADFS functionality
WindowsCertStore.UnitTests/WindowsCertStore.UnitTests.csproj	New test project configuration file

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:03Z

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 ## Overview
 The Windows Certificate Orchestrator Extension is a multi-purpose integration that can remotely manage certificates on a Windows Server's Local Machine Store.  This extension currently manages certificates for the current store types:
+* WinADFS - Rotates the Service-Communications certificate on the primary and secondary AFDS nodes


Typo: "AFDS" should be "ADFS" (Active Directory Federation Services).

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:04Z

 The returned list will contain the actual certificate store name to be used when entering store location.

-This extension implements four job types:  Inventory, Management Add/Remove, and Reenrollment.
+The ADFS extension performs both Inventory and Management Add jobs.  The other extensions implements four job types:  Inventory, Management Add/Remove, and Reenrollment.


Grammatical error: "implements" should be "implement" to agree with the plural subject "other extensions".

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:04Z

+                    foreach (var error in PS.Streams.Error)
+                    {
+                        var errorMsg = error.ToString();
+
+                        // Execution policy messages are informational, not errors
+                        if (errorMsg.Contains("execution policy successfully") ||
+                            errorMsg.Contains("setting is overridden"))
+                        {
+                            _logger.LogInformation($"Execution Policy Info: {errorMsg}");
+                        }
+                        else
+                        {
+                            // Real error
+                            _logger.LogError($"Execution Policy Error: {errorMsg}");
+                            throw new Exception($"Failed to set execution policy: {errorMsg}");
+                        }
+                    }


This foreach loop immediately maps its iteration variable to another variable - consider mapping the sequence explicitly using '.Select(...)'.

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:04Z

+                foreach (string subDir in Directory.GetDirectories(rootDirectory))
+                {
+                    string result = FindScriptsDirectory(subDir, directoryName);
+                    if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(result))
+                    {
+                        return result;
+                    }
+                }


This foreach loop immediately maps its iteration variable to another variable - consider mapping the sequence explicitly using '.Select(...)'.

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:05Z

+            foreach (var entry in machines)
+            {
+                string machineName = entry["Machine"];
+                string username = vault.GetSecret("Username");
+                string password = vault.GetSecret("Password");
+
+                yield return new object[]
+                {
+                    new ClientConnection
+                    {
+                        Machine = machineName,
+                        Username = username,
+                        PrivateKey = password
+                    }
+                };
+            }


This foreach loop immediately maps its iteration variable to another variable - consider mapping the sequence explicitly using '.Select(...)'.

Suggested change

foreach (var entry in machines)

{

string machineName = entry["Machine"];

string username = vault.GetSecret("Username");

string password = vault.GetSecret("Password");

yield return new object[]

{

new ClientConnection

{

Machine = machineName,

Username = username,

PrivateKey = password

}

};

}

return machines.Select(entry =>

{

string machineName = entry["Machine"];

string username = vault.GetSecret("Username");

string password = vault.GetSecret("Password");

return new object[]

{

new ClientConnection

{

Machine = machineName,

Username = username,

PrivateKey = password

}

};

});

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:13Z

+        private ILogger _logger;
+
+        private PSHelper _primaryPsHelper;
+        private string _protocol;


Field '_protocol' can be 'readonly'.

Suggested change

private string _protocol;

private readonly string _protocol;

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:13Z

+        private PSHelper _primaryPsHelper;
+        private string _protocol;
+        private string _port;
+        private bool _useSPN;


Field '_useSPN' can be 'readonly'.

Suggested change

private bool _useSPN;

private readonly bool _useSPN;

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:14Z

        private string serverPassword;

        private bool isLocalMachine;
+        private bool isADFSStore = false;


Field 'isADFSStore' can be 'readonly'.

Suggested change

private bool isADFSStore = false;

private readonly bool isADFSStore = false;

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:14Z

+    public class SANsUnitTests
+    {
+
+        private ClientPSCertStoreReEnrollment enrollment = new ClientPSCertStoreReEnrollment();


Field 'enrollment' can be 'readonly'.

Copilot · 2026-01-06T19:58:14Z

+                                if (result.Success)
+                                {
+                                    complete = new JobResult
+                                    {
+                                        Result = OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Success,
+                                        JobHistoryId = _jobHistoryID,
+                                        FailureMessage = $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotated successfully to thumbprint: {result.Thumbprint}"
+                                    };
+                                }
+                                else
+                                {
+                                    complete = new JobResult
+                                    {
+                                        Result = OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Failure,
+                                        JobHistoryId = _jobHistoryID,
+                                        FailureMessage = $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotation failed. {result.Message}"
+                                    };
+                                }


Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Suggested change

if (result.Success)

{

complete = new JobResult

{

Result = OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Success,

JobHistoryId = _jobHistoryID,

FailureMessage = $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotated successfully to thumbprint: {result.Thumbprint}"

};

}

else

{

complete = new JobResult

{

Result = OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Failure,

JobHistoryId = _jobHistoryID,

FailureMessage = $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotation failed. {result.Message}"

};

}

complete = new JobResult

{

Result = result.Success ? OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Success : OrchestratorJobStatusJobResult.Failure,

JobHistoryId = _jobHistoryID,

FailureMessage = result.Success

? $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotated successfully to thumbprint: {result.Thumbprint}"

: $"Adfs Service Communication Certificate rotation failed. {result.Message}"

};

rcpokorny and others added 2 commits December 10, 2025 15:18

Update generated docs

5eff7a5

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 6, 2026 19:51

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of spbsoluble January 6, 2026 19:52 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Jan 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Old release 3.0#171

Old release 3.0#171
spbsoluble wants to merge 2 commits intorelease-3.0from
old-release-3.0

spbsoluble commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

	private bool isADFSStore = false;
	private readonly bool isADFSStore = false;

Conversation

spbsoluble commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants