-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
feat: add ES512 algorithm support using P-521 elliptic curve #478
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
arsenin-kitsoft
wants to merge
6
commits into
Keats:master
Choose a base branch
from
arsenin-kitsoft:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fd96c1c
feat: add ES512 algorithm support with P-521 elliptic curve
ars9 ebe9da2
fix(crypto): fix ES512 CI failures across rust_crypto and aws_lc_rs b…
ars9 aeec9b5
fix(jwk): gate check_thumbprint test on rust_crypto or aws_lc_rs feature
ars9 cea329d
Merge fix/es512-ci-fixes into master
ars9 e20ab2f
doc(crypto): restore missing doc string
ars9 6cfef07
Merge branch 'Keats:master' into master
arsenin-kitsoft File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
| -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- | ||
| MIHuAgEAMBAGByqGSM49AgEGBSuBBAAjBIHWMIHTAgEBBEIASpHRYZx6l+CIFdI2 | ||
| 9MO1GGnfy4eyWXApZLmQUm9nbZCX2MDY6VB63umkLii3h+ng899S2GNqpWpqK4oc | ||
| TOwlL16hgYkDgYYABABoIJ4A1xiM93QfTORva8sVTWyrqNFC8VaTA9wNbHTV+6U/ | ||
| SyG1IiQ/wjdmHNzZmXMNah/ICrJGcvrJkN8Ol3tEFgD346qAuxWQp5OF4Fvadluo | ||
| uN/z8IPoeGtWIcTeU2xiJMBohyAKBR4j7yCKVVrQ7FFZ6di4LikqgloUeaMeGLop | ||
| OA== | ||
| -----END PRIVATE KEY----- |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a 0.14-rc8 published recently on crates.io, 0.13 is 2 years old. I think the new version might make the rust-crypto code easier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0.14 is in heavy development for the last half year, based on rc history. Are you sure you want an rc dep in your crate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
p256 and p384 are the same story. I've tried to update them all to latest rc and tests were not failing, but I don't think this should be in scope for this particular PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Keats plz confirm if you want to update all p* crates (same maintainer) to rc version or we could skip it for now.