Skip to content

schema.json: Add pattern constraints to supplement the existing qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions constraints#83

Draft
DilumAluthge-LLM wants to merge 3 commits into
JuliaLang:mainfrom
DilumAluthge-LLM:codex/add-portable-url-schema-constraints
Draft

schema.json: Add pattern constraints to supplement the existing qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions constraints#83
DilumAluthge-LLM wants to merge 3 commits into
JuliaLang:mainfrom
DilumAluthge-LLM:codex/add-portable-url-schema-constraints

Conversation

@DilumAluthge-LLM
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DilumAluthge-LLM DilumAluthge-LLM commented May 1, 2026

Prior to this PR, our JSON schema uses qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions. However, if I understand correctly, those are non-standard, and validators won't necessarily check them.

So this PR adds some pattern (regex) constraints to check the same things that qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions. I belive that most validators will check the pattern constraints.

We keep qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions, because they might still be useful if your validator supports them.

This branch builds on top of PR #82.

🤖 Generated by OpenAI Codex.

DilumAluthge-LLM and others added 2 commits May 1, 2026 01:02
Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex GPT-5 <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex GPT-5 <codex@openai.com>
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge changed the title [codex] Add portable URL schema constraints schema.json: Add pattern constraints to complement the existing qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions constraints May 2, 2026
Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex [GPT-5] <codex@openai.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3fd8519)
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge changed the title schema.json: Add pattern constraints to complement the existing qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions constraints schema.json: Add pattern constraints to supplement the existing qt-uri-protocols and qt-uri-extensions constraints May 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant