Fix ref/pull/###/merge at same position as source#48
Open
Tarig0 wants to merge 2 commits intoJetBrains:masterfrom
Open
Fix ref/pull/###/merge at same position as source#48Tarig0 wants to merge 2 commits intoJetBrains:masterfrom
Tarig0 wants to merge 2 commits intoJetBrains:masterfrom
Conversation
Had an issue where the head of the merge request was at the same location as the source so the status was posted to the previous iteration.
Author
|
A little more research found that the reason why this happens is not because the ref/pull/##/merge is the same as the source branch but due to TC VCS root not using the merge commit as the latest change and using the last "real" commit as the revision. This is on the 2018.2 version of TC |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Had an issue where the head of the merge/pull request was at the same location as the source so the status was posted to the previous iteration.