Skip to content

Refactor raster_clip_weighted to use threading#25

Closed
krosenfeld-IDM wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
issue-19
Closed

Refactor raster_clip_weighted to use threading#25
krosenfeld-IDM wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
issue-19

Conversation

@krosenfeld-IDM
Copy link
Collaborator

@krosenfeld-IDM krosenfeld-IDM commented Jun 7, 2025

This pull request refactors the raster_clip_weighted function in rastertoolkit/raster.py to improve performance and maintainability. The changes include introducing parallel processing using ThreadPoolExecutor, encapsulating shape-specific operations into a helper function, and streamlining the code structure.

Performance improvements:

  • Refactored the shape-specific clipping and aggregation logic into a new helper function _clip_weighted_single. This allows for cleaner code and better separation of concerns.
  • Introduced parallel processing using ThreadPoolExecutor to process shapes concurrently, leveraging available CPU cores for faster execution.

Code structure and maintainability:

  • Removed redundant initialization of the output dictionary and moved dictionary updates into the parallel processing loop.
  • Simplified the handling of optional parameters (weight_summary_func) by using default values directly within the helper function.

These updates enhance the readability and scalability of the raster_clip_weighted function while maintaining its core functionality.

@krosenfeld-IDM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

closes #19

@krosenfeld-IDM krosenfeld-IDM marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2025 06:12
@krosenfeld-IDM krosenfeld-IDM requested a review from Copilot June 7, 2025 06:12
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors raster_clip_weighted to run per‐shape clipping and aggregation in parallel threads by extracting the core logic into a helper and streamlining how the output dictionary is built.

  • Introduces _clip_weighted_single for shape‐level processing
  • Uses ThreadPoolExecutor to submit tasks and aggregate results concurrently
  • Simplifies default weight_summary_func handling and removes pre‐initialized data_dict
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

rastertoolkit/raster.py:159

  • Add a docstring to _clip_weighted_single describing its parameters (shp, k1, n_shapes) and return value to improve readability and maintainability.
def _clip_weighted_single(shp, k1, n_shapes):

rastertoolkit/raster.py:159

  • [nitpick] The parameter name k1 is ambiguous; consider renaming it to shape_index or idx to clarify that it represents the current shape’s index.
def _clip_weighted_single(shp, k1, n_shapes):

print_status(shp, data_dict, k1, len(shapes))

data_dict = dict()
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
Copy link

Copilot AI Jun 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this workload is CPU‐bound (NumPy and interpolation), you may see better scaling with ProcessPoolExecutor instead of ThreadPoolExecutor to bypass the GIL.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
krosenfeld-IDM and others added 4 commits June 7, 2025 07:47
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Check whether this impacts the ordering

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@krosenfeld-IDM krosenfeld-IDM marked this pull request as draft June 7, 2025 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants