[Fix] Fix issue with subtree generalization not applying to SELECT DISTINCT ON #87
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
colinthebomb1
changed the title
Contributor
|
@colinthebomb1 , did you try if your new change will pass the postman test for ID_18? |
baiqiushi
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview:
This PR fixes an issue where during subtree generalization the generalization was not applied in SELECT DISTINCT ON (___).
Testing:
testtest_generate_spreadsheet_id_18to correctly generalize the t.playerId inSELECT DISTINCT ON (t.playerId) t.gzpId, t.pubCode, t.playerIdtoSELECT DISTINCT ON (<x1>) <x2>, <x3>, <x1>