Skip to content

Conversation

@kachulis
Copy link

Purpose

QA Inputs in SS2 and Optimus (and any future pipeline using fastqs as input)

Changes

Added FastQC task. For increased speed FastQC is run on only a subset of the fastq reads (can be set by inputs to task).

@kachulis
Copy link
Author

retest this please

@kachulis
Copy link
Author

@ambrosejcarr

@pullapprove pullapprove bot requested review from gbggrant and infispiel May 15, 2019 15:04
Copy link

@gbggrant gbggrant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

}
File barcoded_bam = select_first([AttachBarcodes.bam_output, AttachBarcodesNoIndex.bam_output])
Array[File] fastqc_output_htmls = select_first([FastQC.fastqc_htmls,FastQCNoIndex.fastqc_htmls])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are expecting multiple zips or htmls then I think select_all() would be better here.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since only one of FastQC and FastQCNoIndex will ever be run, using select_all() would just result in an extra unnecessary level of array.

Array[File]? zarr_output_files = OptimusZarrConversion.zarr_output_files

# fastqc
Array[Array[File]] fastqc_htmls = fastqc_output_htmls
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless you really want Array[Array[File]] here it seems like you'd be better off with flatten(fastqc_output_htmls)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed, will do.

fail=true
fi
for htmlfile in ${sep=' ' fastqc_htmls}; do
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you can't easily check the zips here? The test could at least assert that the number of zip files generated is correct.

@nikellepetrillo
Copy link
Contributor

@kbergin do we want to finish work on this?

@kbergin
Copy link
Contributor

kbergin commented Jul 20, 2020

I've made a ticket for us to rebase this and get these changes reviewed and merged in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants