Skip to content

chore(genai): Update gemini model version to 2.5 in live websocket audiogen with txt#13799

Open
angelcaamal wants to merge 1 commit intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
angelcaamal:update-gemini-2.5-live-websocket
Open

chore(genai): Update gemini model version to 2.5 in live websocket audiogen with txt#13799
angelcaamal wants to merge 1 commit intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
angelcaamal:update-gemini-2.5-live-websocket

Conversation

@angelcaamal
Copy link

@angelcaamal angelcaamal commented Feb 6, 2026

Description

Fixes #481469433

Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.

Checklist

@angelcaamal angelcaamal added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. generated: genai Contains Generative AI based code, requesting an additional reviewer. labels Feb 6, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @angelcaamal, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the version of the Gemini model utilized within the live websocket audio generation sample. The change ensures that the sample leverages the latest gemini-live-2.5-flash-native-audio model, providing access to potentially improved features and performance for real-time audio generation from text.

Highlights

  • Gemini Model Update: The GEMINI_MODEL_NAME constant in live_websocket_audiogen_with_txt.py has been updated from gemini-2.0-flash-live-preview-04-09 to gemini-live-2.5-flash-native-audio.
Changelog
  • genai/live/live_websocket_audiogen_with_txt.py
    • Updated the GEMINI_MODEL_NAME constant to gemini-live-2.5-flash-native-audio.
Activity
  • The pull request addresses issue #481469433.
  • The author has provided a checklist, but all items are currently unchecked.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Gemini model version in one of the samples. My review suggests expanding the scope of this change to other relevant sample files for consistency, as detailed in the comment.

@angelcaamal angelcaamal marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 23:23
@angelcaamal angelcaamal requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2026 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

generated: genai Contains Generative AI based code, requesting an additional reviewer. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants